There was already a discussion several times about that. It would be
definitely woth reviewing.
There's another ticket related to this with patches and tests (duplicate?)
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13941
A.
--
Ales Zoulek
+420 604
I use django-filebrowser in a number of projects and find it
invaluable. As of a while ago, Filebrowser became dependent on django-
grappelli, which massively changes the default Django admin.
Meanwhile, Grappelli has morphed and (I feel) become a pain in the
neck to work with (buggy and difficult
I am a beginner. please keep that in mind when responding.
Why Django is not yet integrated support non-relational databases?
Django has the largest community among all Python frameworks. Other
newer frameworks have integrated support for non-relational databases,
such as web2py. Web2py is gainin
Vito,
I am a beginner. please keep that in mind when responding.
Why Django is not yet integrated support non-relational databases?
Django has the largest community among all Python frameworks. Other
newer frameworks have integrated support for non-relational databases,
such as web2py. Web2py
I'm certainly interested in it, although I'm not a Django core developer.
Have you given any thought to allowing users to only read or update a
subset of the fields of a given model? We have a very complex
home-grown authorization system at the company I work for that I'm
very interested in repla
Hi Vito --
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Vito wrote:
> Are you working on it?, If so, please refer me to help in any way
> possible, if not, say why are we so far behind that?
If you read over the archives on this list for the last couple-three
months you'll see that there's a *lot* of activi
On 29 jul, 17:39, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi Vito --
>
> Jacob
Mr Jacob Kaplan-Moss, I am very happy to receive a response from you.
It is a very valuable information.
I just like to say something, to you and the rest of Django
developers:
Django is a framework made by perfectionists
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Vito wrote:
>
>
> On 29 jul, 17:39, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>> Hi Vito --
>>
>> Jacob
>
>
> Mr Jacob Kaplan-Moss, I am very happy to receive a response from you.
> It is a very valuable information.
>
> I just like to say something, to you and the rest of Dj
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM, shacker wrote:
>
> I've been thinking that it seems like solid file management would be a
> good candidate for inclusion in contrib, but wanted to put feeler out
> on this list to see whether others might agree. Would this make a good
> 1.3 feature?
-1
For whate
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM, shacker wrote:
>>
>> I've been thinking that it seems like solid file management would be a
>> good candidate for inclusion in contrib, but wanted to put feeler out
>> on this list to see whether others mig
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:04 PM, SmileyChris wrote:
>
> I agree with Carl.
> We have an abstracted api - having a property with different meanings
> for different backends makes things a lot less pluggable.
Sure. Upon closer investigation, I think this is pretty much a non-issue.
My only point
On Jul 29, 8:09 pm, Tobias McNulty wrote:
>
> For whatever it's worth, my sense is that there are a number of these types
> of third party apps out there, and no single one is a clear winner.
I would have to respectfully disagree - FileBrowser is far and away
the clear winner. There are no viable
Hi,
The process of model discovery is not modified by this patch.
Continue reading for more details.
- Mark
polymorphic is an interesting case, as it only defines one model and that
model is abstract. Therefore polymorphic doesn't need to be in
INSTALLED_APPS (and perhaps my example is therefore
13 matches
Mail list logo
