On 1/23/07, Yann VR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How to achieve to search within a list of id that have been
> sorted in a precise way?
you have to sort it yourself
>
> the __in lookup tag will automatically reorder the list
> by ascendancy (and I reckon in_bulk does the same too).
>
> I have a
+1 for both suggestions:
a) Combined documentation for filling all the gaps. Actually, existing
wiki (code.djangoproject.com) could be used.
b) Django documentation in CHM format. CHM can be used on Mac OS X
(Chmox) and Linux (xCHM) as well as on Windows and it is very
convenient (Personally, I pr
Hi,
keyword expansion might be a good idea for a single file with the
only purpose to make the svn release number available. Then you
could really find out whether someone is using a current or a rather
old release. +1 for this, -1 for using keyword expansion for all files.
Michael
--
noris ne
Hi,
Answering inline.
On 1/24/07, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'd like to propose that we draw up some guidelines for
> contributing documentation for Django, and begin encouraging
> documentation contributions just as much as we encourage code
> contributions.
+1 !
> Maybe we
*Hello, *
* Unlock the secrets to finding work you need to create a high
six-figure income working from home in just three weeks . Learn how to quit
your boring day job and start earning REAL money working for yourself .
Interested candidates can apply online.*
**
***http:
> So I'd like to propose that we draw up some guidelines for
> contributing documentation for Django, and begin encouraging
> documentation contributions just as much as we encourage code
> contributions.
I'm not 100% sure this is the right direction.
As I found out there's lacking documentation
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:47:08PM -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On 1/23/07 9:16 PM, Nate Straz wrote:
> > Why does the admin app tie directly to models? Why not applications?
>
> Because sometimes you want certain models within in app *not* to be
> admin-editable.
Okay, there's a clue tha
Philipp Keller:
>> So I'd like to propose that we draw up some guidelines for
>> contributing documentation for Django, and begin encouraging
>> documentation contributions just as much as we encourage code
>> contributions.
>
> I'm not 100% sure this is the right direction.
> As I found out ther
I wholeheartedly agree. When I was new to Django, I had a very
difficult time moving forward where the four "official" tutorials left
off. I've always admired people that could learn a system by sitting
down with the docs or pouring through the source - unfortuantely, I'm
not one of them. Seeing c
Hello,
one thing that bugs me about URL patterns is that you can specify a
prefix only for the view functions to call, not for the URLs to match.
A quick example
web request:
http://localhost/project/view/1/
urls.py:
urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^view/(?P\d+)/$',
'myproject.myapp.views.view'),
All new tickets being opened on TRAC are assigned to jacob, not sure
if it's to be this way but if it isn't, then you know it's happening!
;)
Maybe get the field empty unless somebody assigns it or set it to "anonymous" :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this m
On 1/24/07, vfoley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> one thing that bugs me about URL patterns is that you can specify a
> prefix only for the view functions to call, not for the URLs to match.
> A quick example
>
> web request:
> http://localhost/project/view/1/
>
> urls.py:
> urlpattern
Marc Fargas Esteve:
> All new tickets being opened on TRAC are assigned to jacob, not sure
> if it's to be this way but if it isn't, then you know it's happening!
No, they don't. It depends on the selected component.
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
T
Hi,
just to give you an idea how fast we proceed: currently 228 out of
655 open tickets have been reviewed, and that does not count all
those that got closed during triage! Isn't that nice?
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +4
Thanks for the info!
On 1/24/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marc Fargas Esteve:
> > All new tickets being opened on TRAC are assigned to jacob, not sure
> > if it's to be this way but if it isn't, then you know it's happening!
>
> No, they don't. It depends on the selected comp
On 1/24/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just to give you an idea how fast we proceed: currently 228 out of
> 655 open tickets have been reviewed, and that does not count all
> those that got closed during triage! Isn't that nice?
Huzzah!
--~--~-~--~~---
On 1/24/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just to give you an idea how fast we proceed: currently 228 out of
> 655 open tickets have been reviewed, and that does not count all
> those that got closed during triage! Isn't that nice?
Keep up the fantastic work, guys!
Adrian
--
Adr
Hi all,
I'm afraid that I am not going to have time in the future to continue
maintaining and merging up the multi-db branch. It's diverged so far
from trunk that any trunk change that touches management.py or models
results in hours of hand-merging and svn detective work... hours that I
just don
Really nice work, congratulations! ;)
On 1/24/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just to give you an idea how fast we proceed: currently 228 out of
> 655 open tickets have been reviewed, and that does not count all
> those that got closed during triage! Isn't that nice?
>
>
On Jan 24, 11:03 am, "vfoley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one thing that bugs me about URL patterns is that you can specify a
> prefix only for the view functions to call, not for the URLs to match.
[snip]
> urls.py:
> urlpatterns = patterns('', prefix_url='project/',
> (r'^view/(?P\d+)/$', 'mypr
On Jan 20, 10:00 am, "Joseph Perla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you already decided on a simple, fast, non-deprecated, standard way of
> extending the User model?
This has been talked about a few times, but nothing concrete yet. I
think one of the more popular ideas was to create a user in
On Jan 24, 2:50 pm, "Marc Fargas Esteve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really nice work, congratulations! ;)
Yes, good work everyone! It at least appears that there is more
activity in the ticket system now ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message becau
We have a section of the wiki listing tutorials etc here:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoResources
Why don't we just spin that off into a new page, categorise things
(e.g. Forms, building-a-blog, simple tutorials, misc. etc) and let
people add their own to that page. This way the blogge
On 1/24/07, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been talked about a few times, but nothing concrete yet. I
> think one of the more popular ideas was to create a user interface for
> custom user models to adhere to. So you could have whatever
> fields/methods you wanted in your mode
Hi,
In the nice graphic on
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/contributing/#ticket-triage
#3279 would go from "Unreviewed" to the left to "worksforme" as the
resolution, but what Triage State would it get? "Unreviewed" is not
true, as it has been reviewed, but it's not "Accepted" either (a
On 1/25/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just to give you an idea how fast we proceed: currently 228 out of
> 655 open tickets have been reviewed, and that does not count all
> those that got closed during triage! Isn't that nice?
Magnificent stuff, guys! You're all doin
Hi Marc!
Marc Fargas Esteve:
> Hi,
> In the nice graphic on
> http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/contributing/#ticket-triage
> #3279 would go from "Unreviewed" to the left to "worksforme" as the
> resolution, but what Triage State would it get? "Unreviewed" is not
> true, as it has been r
Thanks Michael for the explanation, I took the ticket as example until
you pointed me to comment #9 :)
Cheers,
Marc.
On 1/25/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> This ticket is a bad example. It should be open, and it is only
> closed since reopen does currently not work.
>
> W
"For models with file fields (FileField/ImageField etc.) save() is
called twice on manipulator form submission"
Possibly causing duplicate objects to be created in the database.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
link for the lazy:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/639
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsub
see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3012
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
On Jan 23, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On 1/24/07, Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I could care less about most of the keywords. However, having Rev or
>> Id set is handy for the sysadmin down the road trying to figure out
>> where the bug came from.
>
> Isn't that
On 1/25/07, Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For example, admin A finds out about Django downloads a tarball /
> checks out svn. He installs it to /usr/local/blah and writes some web
> apps. At some point in the future admin B has to find out why an app
> is not working and it turns out t
Just wanted to put a note on here...that there are people actively
using this branch. I've been using it since the beginning of
December...and have found it to work fantastically... ( well I did send
JP a bug report today ... with a sample project ... when he told me
this news ).
I do hope in th
On Jan 24, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 1/25/07, Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> For example, admin A finds out about Django downloads a tarball /
>> checks out svn. He installs it to /usr/local/blah and writes some web
>> apps. At some point in the future admin B
I love the way newforms is shaping up - when finished it's going to be
very powerful.
In the regression tests ~line 2250 there is an example for dynamic
constuction of a Form
/* snip
It's possible to construct a Form dynamically by adding to the
self.fields
dictionary in __init__(). Don't forg
36 matches
Mail list logo
