I'd like to draw some attention to ticket
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2232 (mainly russelm's attention as
it appeared after his checkin 3195).
Basically ManyToMany relations don't work when you try to get related
queryset from a model where ManyToManyField is defined. Or is it just
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 14:04 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> I'd like to draw some attention to ticket
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2232 (mainly russelm's attention as
> it appeared after his checkin 3195).
>
> Basically ManyToMany relations don't work when you try to get related
> qu
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 20:20 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 14:04 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> > I'd like to draw some attention to ticket
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2232 (mainly russelm's attention as
> > it appeared after his checkin 3195).
> >
> > Ba
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Pretty much "just you", but it's obviously a little trickier than that.
> This is basically ticket #1796 occurring again.
I've dug a bit further and have found out that mentioned changeset
(3195) has broken only certain relations (for cross-app models and
another cas
Thanks for helping :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On 6/25/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to draw some attention to ticket
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2232 (mainly russelm's attention as
> it appeared after his checkin 3195).
Paying attention now :-)
> Basically ManyToMany relations don't work when you try
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 22:39 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 6/25/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to draw some attention to ticket
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2232 (mainly russelm's attention as
> > it appeared after his checkin 3195).
>
> Paying
Uros Trebec wrote:
> > Sounds nice, this is a feature I'm currently looking for... but I've
> > already started my own implementation.
>
> Nice! Do you have anyting in code yet? Any bottlenecks?
>
sorry not yet. But will come, I need it for my current development.
>
> > I would just share it wit
Hello all,
I've found something that looks like a bug.
When I add
TEMPLATE_STRING_IF_INVALID = 'INVALID'
to my config, first page of admin (i.e. http://127.0.0.1:8000/admin/)
is rendered without 'Django administration' headline.
--
Sincerely,
Vladimir "Farcaller" Pouzanov
http://www.hackndev.co
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I've just checked in r3202 which I believe fixes the root cause of #1796
> in a reasonably correct way. I think it also fixes #2232 for the same
> reason.
It does (just checked). Marking ticket fixed...
Thank you very much, Malcolm and Russel and everyone else!
--~--
Hi Russel,
> 2) I have seen the behaviour from r1796 before - for me, the problem
> ultimately turned out to be caused by a PYTHONPATH that included the
> application directory (so "from myapp.models import Foo" and "from
> myproject.myapp.models import Foo" were both legal). At the time, I
> cha
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> I can no longer cause #1796 or anything like it to fail -- and I had a
> couple of failing examples there. I believe relative imports
> (appname.models, etc) might now work reliably too (experiments suggest
> they do), which means you no longer are reliant on your pr
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 00:58 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I've just checked in r3202 which I believe fixes the root cause of #1796
> in a reasonably correct way. I think it also fixes #2232 for the same
> reason. It all seems to come down to the import paths being used as
> dictionary keys a
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 18:36 +0200, gabor wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> >
> > I can no longer cause #1796 or anything like it to fail -- and I had a
> > couple of failing examples there. I believe relative imports
> > (appname.models, etc) might now work reliably too (experiments suggest
>
On 6/25/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Russ: can you see if I've overlooked any problem there, please. It took
> a little while to track everything down and my brain may have gotten
> twisted in the process.
The anti-model-duplication logic makes sense to me from what I
und
On 6/25/06, Vladimir Pouzanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've found something that looks like a bug.
I just tried and got the same thing. I've opened ticket #2237 to
follow the problem, and added you to the CC list for that ticket.
Thanks for the report,
Russ Magee %-)
--~--~-~--~--
16 matches
Mail list logo
