> Short version: model-aware validation is being worked on. We didn't get
> it finished for 1.0, but it's still ongoing work.
Wouldn't it be nice to replace these three parameters by something like:
class SomeModel(models.Model):
[...]
class Meta:
unique_together = ('title', 'pub_
On Sep 28, 5:02 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Short version: model-aware validation is being worked on. We didn't get
> it finished for 1.0, but it's still ongoing work.
Great! Judging by the activity this is tracked in #6845 so I included
a note and a reference in the ticke
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 15:07 -0700, oggie rob wrote:
> Hi all,
> unique_for_date (and for_month, for_year as well) are not functional
> in 1.0, but before I try to get them working, I'm wondering if there
> is any thought about those fields.
>
> Currently they are included in the model field defi
Hi all,
unique_for_date (and for_month, for_year as well) are not functional
in 1.0, but before I try to get them working, I'm wondering if there
is any thought about those fields.
Currently they are included in the model field definition, but of
course the documentation mentions that it is used
