Re: tickets and use of the 1.0 milestones

2008-07-03 Thread Jannis Leidel
> As with many things, the process of becoming a committer is documented > in our contributing document > (http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/contributing/#commit-access > ): > > [...] > > To request commit access, please contact an existing committer > privately. Public requests for comm

Re: tickets and use of the 1.0 milestones

2008-07-03 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Jannis Leidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, could we fix that bottleneck by appointing more > developers to be core developers? As with many things, the process of becoming a committer is documented in our contributing document (http://www.dja

Re: tickets and use of the 1.0 milestones

2008-07-03 Thread Tom Tobin
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Jannis Leidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Even if these sorts of features have a patch and are "Ready for checkin," >> that does not mean they get a 1.0 milestone. They still take core >> developer time to review and commit, time that also needs to be >> focused

Re: tickets and use of the 1.0 milestones

2008-07-03 Thread Jannis Leidel
> I would like to stress the point that features not on the list are not > to be put in any 1.0 milestone.  For those working on tickets for > features or enhancements that are not on the list, please understand > that these are lower priority than vetted features and *all* bugs.  If > you really

tickets and use of the 1.0 milestones

2008-07-03 Thread Gary Wilson Jr.
I would like to remind those out there setting milestones on tickets to follow the following guidelines that Jacob put forth: * Must-have feature bugs go in the "1.0 alpha" milestone. These basically should be all nfa-blocker tickets. Bugs in the must-have features are not to be part of thi