Re: ticket 3310

2007-08-15 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 22:27 -0600, Norman Harman wrote: > Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > > One obvious test would have been to create a test directory that didn't > > contain a models file but did contain a tests.py file. > I would be wary of writing unittests that created stuff on people's > filesy

Re: ticket 3310

2007-08-15 Thread Norman Harman
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > One obvious test would have been to create a test directory that didn't > contain a models file but did contain a tests.py file. I would be wary of writing unittests that created stuff on people's filesystem. > I think one reason the patch hasn't been applied is that i

Re: ticket 3310

2007-08-15 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 21:04 -0600, Norman Harman wrote: > ticket 3310 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3310 > manage.py test does not work if there is not a model.py in the application > > The 6mo patch doesn't apply anymore. Is there a reason it was never applied? &

Re: ticket 3310

2007-08-15 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 8/16/07, Norman Harman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like this to be fixed. I'd like to update the patch incorporating any > concerns the > list might have. I wouldn't like there to be someone else posting a similar > email as this > one in 6mo wondering why my patch was never applied.

ticket 3310

2007-08-15 Thread Norman Harman
ticket 3310 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3310 manage.py test does not work if there is not a model.py in the application The 6mo patch doesn't apply anymore. Is there a reason it was never applied? Apps without models seem valid to me. I have a couple django apps that don