On 4/4/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to challenge the closing of
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2229#comment:4
>
> I do see Russell's point about syncdb not having schema-evolution
> behaviour for data fields, but it DOES have schema-evolution for
> missing tables
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 05:28 +, SmileyChris wrote:
> I'd like to challenge the closing of
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2229#comment:4
>
> I do see Russell's point about syncdb not having schema-evolution
> behaviour for data fields, but it DOES have schema-evolution for
> missing ta
I'd like to challenge the closing of
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2229#comment:4
I do see Russell's point about syncdb not having schema-evolution
behaviour for data fields, but it DOES have schema-evolution for
missing tables - you don't have to drop the whole app. So why can't it
creat
