Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The d-users list is getting pretty high volume, and I think it would help to
>> split some off that isn't really django but "something built with django."
>
> It seems like the current arrangement works well enough.
On 7/1/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The d-users list is getting pretty high volume, and I think it would help to
> split some off that isn't really django but "something built with django."
It seems like the current arrangement works well enough. If a
Django-powered project is su
On 7/2/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The d-users list is getting pretty high volume, and I think it would help to
> split some off that isn't really django but "something built with django."
>
> Is this the right place to make such a suggestion?
Right place to make the suggestio
Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The d-users list is getting pretty high volume, and I think it would help to
>> split some off that isn't really django but "something built with django."
>
> It doesn't seem like 3rd-party announcements compose much of t
On 7/1/07, Carl Karsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The d-users list is getting pretty high volume, and I think it would help to
> split some off that isn't really django but "something built with django."
It doesn't seem like 3rd-party announcements compose much of that
volume. Are you tryin
The d-users list is getting pretty high volume, and I think it would help to
split some off that isn't really django but "something built with django."
Is this the right place to make such a suggestion?
Carl K
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message beca
