On 12/18/06, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Honza Král wrote:
> > On 12/18/06, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Honza Král wrote:
> > > > On 12/17/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Feel free to take
> > > > > on any of the items mentioned in this
Honza Král wrote:
> On 12/18/06, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Honza Král wrote:
> > > On 12/17/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Feel free to take
> > > > on any of the items mentioned in this e-mail, as long as we've all
> > > > agreed on the right way to sol
Gary Wilson wrote:
> Some more suggestions based on things that I have experienced while
> recently making an application that required many forms based on
> models:
>
> - Ability to not display certain fields, mainly for when the value will
> be post-filled in the view (i.e. the owner of an obje
Some more suggestions based on things that I have experienced while
recently making an application that required many forms based on
models:
- Ability to not display certain fields, mainly for when the value will
be post-filled in the view (i.e. the owner of an object being set to
the logged in u
On 12/18/06, Gary Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Honza Král wrote:
> > On 12/17/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Feel free to take
> > > on any of the items mentioned in this e-mail, as long as we've all
> > > agreed on the right way to solve the problems. Rewriting the
>
Honza Král wrote:
> On 12/17/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feel free to take
> > on any of the items mentioned in this e-mail, as long as we've all
> > agreed on the right way to solve the problems. Rewriting the
> > validators to Fields would be a much-welcomed contribution, t
On 12/17/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12/16/06, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > there are a few things I would like to see in there (or where
> > appropriate) and don't know if somebody is already working on it (or
> > other things that would clash with this effor
On 12/17/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> > Yes, there should be a way to specify the widget for a field in the
> > model. The question is, should it be specified as a keyword argument
> > to the field declaration, or should it be passed in the "class Admin"
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> Yes, there should be a way to specify the widget for a field in the
> model. The question is, should it be specified as a keyword argument
> to the field declaration, or should it be passed in the "class Admin"?
Would it be better to specify it as and additional parameter
On 12/16/06, Honza Král <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there are a few things I would like to see in there (or where
> appropriate) and don't know if somebody is already working on it (or
> other things that would clash with this effort), or if I should give
> it a try.
Hi Honza,
Thanks for bringi
Hi all,
I would like to ask what is the status of django/newforms/models.py
there are a few things I would like to see in there (or where
appropriate) and don't know if somebody is already working on it (or
other things that would clash with this effort), or if I should give
it a try.
mainly:
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
