On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On 13-8-2012 1:54, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>> In my view, the current largest source of boilerplate with management
>> commands is where they have to be, you have to stick them 3 directories
>> deep. Writing a command itself is pretty boilerpl
On 13-8-2012 1:54, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> In my view, the current largest source of boilerplate with management
> commands is where they have to be, you have to stick them 3 directories
> deep. Writing a command itself is pretty boilerplate free.
Ironically, this is easily fixed with a createcomma
Hi,
On Monday, August 13, 2012 1:54:36 AM UTC+2, Alex_Gaynor wrote:
>
> In my view, the current largest source of boilerplate with management
> commands is where they have to be, you have to stick them 3 directories
> deep. Writing a command itself is pretty boilerplate free.
>
Agreed, a saner
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Florian Apolloner
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:22:58 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> >>
> >> I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, a
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Florian Apolloner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:22:58 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, as always, my question is
>> about backwards compatibility.
>
>
> Seriously? In my eyes it's ugly, especi
Some people prefer argparse, some people prefer decorator-based syntax
(like django-boss or argh), there are people prefer other methods (e.g.
docopt). I think it is better not to invent yet another command-line
framework.
Maybe delegate option parsing to user favorive library and provide some
Hi,
On Sunday, August 12, 2012 2:22:58 AM UTC+2, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> I'll agree that it looks appealing. However, as always, my question is
> about backwards compatibility.
>
Seriously? In my eyes it's ugly, especially if you have more than one
options. Eg imagine you have decorated
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:26 AM, dffdgsdfgsdfhjhtre wrote:
> https://github.com/zacharyvoase/django-boss
> http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/2009/12/09/django-boss/
>
> What is the outlook of something like this replacing the current way
> management commands are handled by django? I'm no the author of
https://github.com/zacharyvoase/django-boss
http://blog.zacharyvoase.com/2009/12/09/django-boss/
What is the outlook of something like this replacing the current way
management commands are handled by django? I'm no the author of
django-boss, but I think this syntax is much better and more pytho
