Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-03-03 Thread Marc Boeren
Done, it's http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3644 A patch is included. Ciao, Marc. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develope

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-03-02 Thread Simon G.
Please add them to Trac, as it's a good idea to keep an eye on them. There's a few multi-db bugs/patches out there, e.g.: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3613 http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3301 If one of the trac-admins can add a multi-db value to the "version" field in Trac, that wo

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-03-02 Thread Marc Boeren
I just installed the multi-db branch yesterday and I think it is something that surely must be supported, and I'll play more with it the coming time. I have a simple schema-evolution idea that does not alter existing tables, but simply copies data to new tables in another database. Don't know if

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-03-02 Thread Kumar McMillan
are you using postgres? if so, when this happens again try typing: $ ps aux | grep postmaster do you see more than one process saying something to the effect of "waiting for transaction?" you may have created a deadlock (i.e. transaction2 trying to operate on a locked row, but transaction1 wait

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-02-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've currently uncovered two bugs so far with this branch... but am unsure where to go to enter them in for tracking. I've got a ton of stuff working, and these popped up when I was trying to do a few complicated things. 1. If you are doing a someclass.objects.filter and use a select_related

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-02-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've added a nice document on how to get a project up and running with multiple-db-branch on the wiki page. I'd be interested in eventually maintaining the code...or helping to maintain the code...but one of the main reasons I hadn't looked too much into it is that I'm under a big deadline right

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-02-28 Thread Kumar McMillan
On 2/27/07, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Documentation: no big feature can be added without complete > documentation. In particular, a section needs to be written describing > how the change affects existing code, and what the upgrade path (if > any) is. The docs have been start

Re: multiple-db-support branch

2007-02-27 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On 2/27/07, Alexander Solovyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I have question - what needs to happen for merging this branch into > trunk? I read page on wiki (MultipleDatabaseSupport) and examined that > all features are completed but the docs absent in all. So writing docs > will cause to mergi

multiple-db-support branch

2007-02-27 Thread Alexander Solovyov
Hi all. Few minutes ago I drop mail to Jason Pellerin and he tolds me that he can't maintain branch due to lack of time. So I have question - what needs to happen for merging this branch into trunk? I read page on wiki (MultipleDatabaseSupport) and examined that all features are completed but t