Re: metaapi: Django Meta-API - Invitation to Criticize!

2006-11-18 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Daniel Poelzleithner wrote: > If such a Interface is specified, it should be flexible enough to switch > backends. In my optinion PIL has a total terrible quality when compared > to ImageMagick. that's a rather broad statement, don't you think? what are you doing with PIL, and how are you doin

Re: metaapi: Django Meta-API - Invitation to Criticize!

2006-11-18 Thread Daniel Poelzleithner
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > Some of these ideas sound really cool! I'd suggest focusing on one or > two of them rather than attempting to do the whole shebang. In my > opinion, the Python Imaging Library functions as generic views would > be a really useful thing to have. If such a Interface is spe

Re: metaapi: Django Meta-API - Invitation to Criticize!

2006-11-17 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 11/16/06, binberati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is what came to my mind a second ago (maybe two) after reading > James Bennett's blog entry 'Django tips: get the most out of generic > views'[0]. Some of these ideas sound really cool! I'd suggest focusing on one or two of them rather than

metaapi: Django Meta-API - Invitation to Criticize!

2006-11-16 Thread binberati
Hello, This is what came to my mind a second ago (maybe two) after reading James Bennett's blog entry 'Django tips: get the most out of generic views'[0]. Wouldn't it be nice to have generic views (REST APIs) for: - Filesystem operations (on *nix for a start). Loose coupling with Python's OS mo