Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-21 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 4/21/06, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great news Adrian. I was just about to add my CsrfMiddleware into > contrib (see other thread) - but now you've called feature freeze. > Shall I still go ahead and add it? It can't affect anything else since > it isn't actually used anywhere.

Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-21 Thread pbx
This is great news. I've been using M-R for a couple months on a restricted-access production site and am very happy with it. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to thi

Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-21 Thread Luke Plant
On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:26, Adrian Holovaty wrote: > At this point, Django's magic-removal branch is stable enough that > we're ready to begin the merging process. I've been running the > branch on chicagocrime.org for a couple of weeks with no problems. As > of right now, Jacob and I are fr

Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-21 Thread hugo
>By way of process - Is the plan to make a formal release after the merge, or >will the "MR Trunk" be allowed to settle a little longer before we formally >tag a release? And, to follow a previous disussion, are we going to tag the >current state of trunk as a 0.92 release reflecting all the trunk

Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-20 Thread limodou
On 4/21/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > At this point, Django's magic-removal branch is stable enough that > we're ready to begin the merging process. I've been running the branch > on chicagocrime.org for a couple of weeks with no problems. As of > right now, Jacob

Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-20 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 4/21/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Timeline: Let's aim for a merge on next Friday, April 28. That shouldgive us enough time to work on documentation and iron out last-minutebugs.Huzzah! A collective thanks to all involved in getting this beast off the ground, and those in the us

Re: magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-20 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 4/20/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At this point, Django's magic-removal branch is stable enough that > we're ready to begin the merging process. I've been running the branch > on chicagocrime.org for a couple of weeks with no problems. As of > right now, Jacob and I are fr

magic-removal call for testing

2006-04-20 Thread Adrian Holovaty
Hi all, At this point, Django's magic-removal branch is stable enough that we're ready to begin the merging process. I've been running the branch on chicagocrime.org for a couple of weeks with no problems. As of right now, Jacob and I are freezing feature additions to the branch and concentrating