On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Paul McMillan wrote:
>> There has been some discussion of unittest2 before on the list, and
>> there's a ticket about including it.
>> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12991
>>
>> We get a bunch of
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Paul McMillan wrote:
> There has been some discussion of unittest2 before on the list, and
> there's a ticket about including it.
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12991
>
> We get a bunch of useful features with unittest2, and everyone I've
> spoken with on #
On 14 June 2010 23:06, Paul McMillan wrote:
> 1) Include the unittest2 library along with the Django distribution as
> we have with simplejson. We can use the system's library if it exists,
> or import our bundled copy if it does not. This has the drawback of
> requiring us to keep that library cu
There has been some discussion of unittest2 before on the list, and
there's a ticket about including it.
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12991
We get a bunch of useful features with unittest2, and everyone I've
spoken with on #django-dev agrees that it would be a useful thing to
get into core
