On Thursday 02 August 2007 10:40:22 James Tauber wrote:
> Another possibility would be, as I currently do for XHTML content,
> just expect the raw XML to be passed in. e.g.:
>
> def item_extension_elements(self, item):
> return """
>
> US
> By
Support for extra XML attributes exists now. You can include
feed_extra_attrs and/or item_extra_attrs that return a dictionary of
attribute name values to add to the feed and entry respectively.
I haven't added support for extension elements (which is what Google
Base "attributes" are) yet
On Aug 1, 5:21 pm, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As of r11, the full data model for the Atom Format (RFC 4287) is now
> implemented.
Great stuff. How easy is it to extend feeds with additional
attributes, e.g. for Google Base?
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
As of r11, the full data model for the Atom Format (RFC 4287) is now
implemented.
On 31/07/2007, at 4:19 AM, James Tauber wrote:
>
> As described here[1], I finally got around to working on improving
> django support for the Atom Publishing Format. There's been a ticket
> [2] for this since Py
As described here[1], I finally got around to working on improving
django support for the Atom Publishing Format. There's been a ticket
[2] for this since PyCon but yesterday I started a Google Code
project and now I'm mostly done.
Equivalents to django.contrib.syndication.feeds.Feed,
djan
