Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-28 Thread James Bennett
On 3/28/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If possible I would like to see dojo *not* included in django's SVN repo. > just a pointer to where DOJO is installed on your docroot should be > sufficent for most things, and remove the need to figure out what > things should/shoiuldn't be i

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-28 Thread James Bennett
On 3/28/06, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From the top of my head we need dojo.io, but I assume it is included > indirectly by other packages. Ack. Yeah, I just forgot that one when I compiled my list. -- "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- Geor

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-28 Thread Ian Holsman
If possible I would like to see dojo *not* included in django's SVN repo. just a pointer to where DOJO is installed on your docroot should be sufficent for most things, and remove the need to figure out what things should/shoiuldn't be included. (ps.. I use AOL's base at http://o.aolcdn.com/iam

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-28 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
James Bennett wrote: > > dojo.dom > dojo.event > dojo.html > dojo.lang > dojo.widget > dojo.xml > > What else needs to be included? From the top of my head we need dojo.io, but I assume it is included indirectly by other packages. Thanks, Eugene --~--~-~--~~~--

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-28 Thread James Bennett
Quick update: I now have a magic-removal install with all of the admin JS ported to Dojo packages. There are some crufty bits that still need to be cleaned up, but it works! Next step: I need to know what sort of Dojo functionality people are going to rely on, because we're going to have to do a

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-24 Thread James Bennett
On 3/24/06, David S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds thorough. Are there plans for templates to support this, ala Rails > helpers? It would be nice to use the events system to full effect so perhaps > that sort of helper/template tag idea would not work very well. I'm not planning to implem

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-24 Thread David S .
James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thoughts? Arguments? Tell me I'm on crack? Sounds thorough. Are there plans for templates to support this, ala Rails helpers? It would be nice to use the events system to full effect so perhaps that sort of helper/template tag idea would not work ver

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-24 Thread James Bennett
On 3/24/06, David S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am wondering if it is still planned to release some Dojo integration soon > and if there is any idea what that will look like. I've been working on the Dojo/Django integration, and I'm pretty close to having something that works and that I can

Re: dojo implementation

2006-03-24 Thread David S .
David S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [snip] I am wondering if it is still planned to release some Dojo > integration soon and if there is any idea what that will look like. I have > not > found any hint of if in the magic-removal branch. Terribly sorry. I meant to post to django.user. Bu

dojo implementation

2006-03-24 Thread David S .
I have been using Dojo with Django and plan to do quite a bit more in the next little while. I am wondering if it is still planned to release some Dojo integration soon and if there is any idea what that will look like. I have not found any hint of if in the magic-removal branch. Some insight w