Dude, how broken is you mail client? It's attaching this thread
continuation
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 15:15 -0800, Matthew D. Hancher wrote:
[...]
> Okay. Given all this, how do people feel about a connection_created
> signal? What about a cursor_created signal, either instead or in
> addition?
As long as you get the connection itself, i would think that would be
sufficient, obviously the receiver should know which connection it is
in the multi-db scenario, as it won't be able to just infer that based
on the settings.
On Nov 17, 6:15 pm, "Matthew D. Hancher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matthew, would you mind sticking the script you used to test this up
> on dpaste?
I'd love to, but it wasn't really a script per se, so much as a hodge-
podge that involved twiddling the server, restarting it, running some
tests, changing the server config again, and
Matthew, would you mind sticking the script you used to test this up
on dpaste?
Alex
On Nov 17, 3:01 pm, "Matthew D. Hancher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:03 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I know this is a horribly nebulous question (like all benchma
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Matthew D. Hancher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I decided to do a bit of profiling to keep the conversation moving.
I did too; I took a stab at measure the raw speed of calling signals.
My code's at http://gist.github.com/25892; the output looks like:
Nothi
On Nov 16, 11:03 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I know this is a horribly nebulous question (like all benchmarking),
> and it's completely dependent on the speed of your machine and a
> million other factors. However, if we are going to start adding
> signals to very commo
Right, I understand the need for absolute numbers, I just meant that
we don't need to start rewriting new benchmarks if Jeremy still has
the benchmark script.
Alex
On Nov 16, 11:03 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EM
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, Jeremy Dunck was kind enough to do a benchmark against the old
> system:
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/815f76ad7e823cbf/b008a757fbdefa2b
I knew about these. While th
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 19:21 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, Jeremy Dunck was kind enough to do a benchmark against the old
> system:
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/815f76ad7e823cbf/b008a757fbdefa2b
Since we're no longer using the old system, that
Well, Jeremy Dunck was kind enough to do a benchmark against the old
system:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/815f76ad7e823cbf/b008a757fbdefa2b
On Nov 16, 9:49 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Malcolm
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:11 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> In terms of signal overhead, the most likely case here is probably no
>> receivers, and in the signal refactor, that particular case is now
>> hugely
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:11 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In terms of signal overhead, the most likely case here is probably no
> receivers, and in the signal refactor, that particular case is now
> hugely faster.
"Hugely" being, of course, a highly scientific measurement lending
itself to a
Finally, it occurred to me that a signal on *cursor* creation could
> > also be useful, and could easily be added at the same time. (In fact
> > in the old patch the connection_created signal actually erroneously
> > behaved like a cursor_created signal for some back-ends.)
&g
sor* creation could
> also be useful, and could easily be added at the same time. (In fact
> in the old patch the connection_created signal actually erroneously
> behaved like a cursor_created signal for some back-ends.)
I'm not up to speed these days on the overhead for signal
Hi all,
I've been playing with adding sqlite3 back-end support to GeoDjango,
using the SpatiaLite extension. This requires executing some magic
SQL each time you connect to the database, to enable the spatial
extensions. Ticket #6064 seems like this right way to do this, by
causing the
Sorry about that, I thought because I was considering editing the
code, I might be better off asking you gentlemen, so I asked in both
places...
On the other hand, of course this is for working on django proper -- I
should've thought of that.
Good work on django tho, .;-]
Jared Nuzzolillo
On Ju
Hi Jarad --
Please direct questions of this nature to django-users; django-dev is
used to discuss the development of Django itself, not to answer usage
questions.
Thanks!
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Greetings. I am about 75% through creating a django application as a
new section of my company's site, www.etsy.com. It's basically a CMS,
something that I know django is especially well suited to (tho I can
tell it would work for nearly any domain).
Recently, my site ops team started asking me q
18 matches
Mail list logo
