On Aug 9, 8:46 pm, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> group_obj.user_set.all() /is/ available :)
Doh. I forgot about the _set thing...
Moral of the story: don't code if you've not slept for 36 hours
--
Richard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this me
group_obj.user_set.all() /is/ available :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Hi guys,
I'm just wondering if there is a rationale for leaving off the
related_name attribute on the 'groups' field for the User model.
I can't think of a reason against this? Surely it would be beneficial
to have group_object.users.all() available?
--
Richard
--~--~-~--~~---
