Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-17 Thread JP
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > And my apologies to use, JP: I still haven't gotten around to reviewing > all the changes as I promised I would. It's not forgotten, more that > Life has gotten in the way of Fun Projects a lot lately and there aren't > enough hours in the day. No need to apologize. Th

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-16 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 09:54 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: [...] > And my apologies to use, JP: Hmm ... should have been "my apologies to *you*...". One day I really will have to sit down and learn this English language thing (and maybe take some kind of "how to type" class). Malcolm --~--~

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-16 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 14:53 +, JP wrote: > James Bennett wrote: > > On 10/13/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know it's off-topic, but do you have any thoughts as to which > > > branch? > > > > Based on my sporadic glances, I'd agree with you that row-level perms > > and mult

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-16 Thread JP
James Bennett wrote: > On 10/13/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know it's off-topic, but do you have any thoughts as to which > > branch? > > Based on my sporadic glances, I'd agree with you that row-level perms > and multi-db both look like good candidates to be finalized and > m

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-15 Thread Ned Batchelder
I can understand the desire to keep the branch count low, but looking at the number of people asking for Unicode support, and the broad applicability it would have, and the comparitvely low demand for row-level permissions and multi-db support, I would argue for starting the Unicode branch now.

Re: Merging branches. was:Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my use of row-level-permission, I've also found Chris Long to be very helpful in adding fixes. It's now working very well in my use (although I'm not stretching it very much, it's certainly been essential for my app, and it would be nice to get it into core). Is there ever a roundup of branch

Re: Merging branches. was:Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-14 Thread Jay Parlar
On 10/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually I have a need for both row-level-permissions (at least I > hope the model fits my needs) AND multi-db branch so would be thrilled > to be able to easily get them both. > Well, all I can say about that is try testing with t

Merging branches. was:Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I have a need for both row-level-permissions (at least I hope the model fits my needs) AND multi-db branch so would be thrilled to be able to easily get them both. -- Ben Jay Parlar wrote: > I know it's off-topic, but do you have any thoughts as to which > branch? I've been havi

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread gabor
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > On 10/13/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Max Derkachev wrote: >>> There were a lot of words about unicodification of Django, but things >>> has not been moved a bit further. >> Or at least it would be nice to hear from someone of the core team why >> it can

Re: Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread James Bennett
On 10/13/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know it's off-topic, but do you have any thoughts as to which > branch? Based on my sporadic glances, I'd agree with you that row-level perms and multi-db both look like good candidates to be finalized and merged. -- "May the forces of evi

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread Jay Parlar
On 10/14/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey there, > > I'm very interested in getting this done, but we've got quite a few > branches open at the moment. I think we should focus on merging at > least one of these branches before opening another one, for the sake > of everybody's

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > I'm very interested in getting this done, but we've got quite a few > branches open at the moment. I think we should focus on merging at > least one of these branches before opening another one, for the sake > of everybody's sanity. Thanks, Adrian! This is clear now :-).

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 10/13/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Max Derkachev wrote: > > There were a lot of words about unicodification of Django, but things > > has not been moved a bit further. > > Or at least it would be nice to hear from someone of the core team why > it can't be done (either right n

Re: bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread Ivan Sagalaev
Max Derkachev wrote: > There were a lot of words about unicodification of Django, but things > has not been moved a bit further. Or at least it would be nice to hear from someone of the core team why it can't be done (either right now or at all). I remember Jacob (I think) has said once along t

bump: give Gabor (or somebody else) a unicode branch in svn

2006-10-13 Thread Max Derkachev
There were a lot of words about unicodification of Django, but things has not been moved a bit further. The beginning is at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/bad8f2c4628646dc Regards, Max --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this