Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

On 09/01/16 13:08, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote: Not an actual django developer (I'm a user lurking here really), but I'd still like to chime in: Doesn't make your input any less valid... in fact, perhaps makes it more valuable :) * Jira is too complex. Devs may end up understanding it, but

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

asy, categorize is easy, look through the all issues and task is quick. > > I would like to propose a vote on Jira as the bugtracker for this project. > Just vote + or - to see how many people agree on this. > Not an actual django developer (I'm a user lurking here really), but I'

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

No problem. Don't forget the documentation too. That was called out in the original license. For instance, I'd put it right on the README.md on the correct project(s) on GitHub under the license section. OTOH, I'm now interested in checking it out, so thanks. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Andre

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Hi Joe On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Joe Tennies wrote: > I'm not a lawyer, but I care about licensing. > > The MIT License would allow you to relicense it, but you must keep the > original copyrights in tact. (From license: Redistribution and use in > source and binary forms, *with or without

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

I'm not a lawyer, but I care about licensing. The MIT License would allow you to relicense it, but you must keep the original copyrights in tact. (From license: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, *with or without modification*, are permitted...) It does have a list of "buts" too.

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Hi Andrey, On 01/07/2016 04:23 PM, Andrey Antukh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Florian Apolloner > The DRFv2 (as DRFv3) as far as I know is licensed using MIT permissive > license that does not impide take the source and re-license it under > other license. > > taiga.io

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

HI Florian On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Florian Apolloner wrote: > Hi Yamila, > > On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 2:22:21 PM UTC+1, Yamila Moreno wrote: >> >> I just wanted to let you know that me or anyone in our team would be glad >> to answer any question about the product, saas or instal

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Weighing in on Jira specifically - I’ve had to use it on a number of projects, and I’ve never had a good experience with it. That might be because the Jira instances were badly configured - bit if that’s the case, it suggests to me that there’s a deeper problem with Jira being too complex for it’s

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

I used Jira at my previous company. It is a great tool, but it is _extremely_ heavyweight. Unless you need to high level of customisation of workflows and integrations it can provide, and have someone intimately familiar with it and/or have the nearly-full-time job of learning and fiddling with

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Hi Yamila, On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 2:22:21 PM UTC+1, Yamila Moreno wrote: > > I just wanted to let you know that me or anyone in our team would be glad > to answer any question about the product, saas or installation, migrating > issues or anything related. No strings attached, of course

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Hi, > Are you already familiar with Trac and the way we use it? > I'm familiar with trac (we were using it some year ago), and I'm a bit familiar with django workflow because I attended a couple of sprints. Anyway, I'm not an expert in trac. > > Key things are: > > * integration with Gi

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, Yamila Moreno wrote: >I'm Yamila, part of Taiga Team and Kaleidos (the company that develops >Taiga.io). We're very happy to be as a "completely hypothetical" candidate >for a new bugtracker. Taiga (a Django and open source project) being used

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Hi there, I'm Yamila, part of Taiga Team and Kaleidos (the company that develops Taiga.io). We're very happy to be as a "completely hypothetical" candidate for a new bugtracker. Taiga (a Django and open source project) being used by django-dev would be huge :) I just wa

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

To search Trac, use "site:code.djangoproject.com your query" in a Google search box. Works great in my experience. On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 6:42:44 PM UTC-5, Josh Smeaton wrote: > > FWIW I actually like Jira (much more than Trac) and find it a lot easier > to use. I think the trick is co

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

FWIW I actually like Jira (much more than Trac) and find it a lot easier to use. I think the trick is configuring very basic workflows so users don't have to fight through transitions. Open, Closed, Assigned/In Progress and transitions to and from each state would get us really close to the curr

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Looks like it is a NO to the proposition. Daniele I like what I saw in taiga, that's a way better bug tracking UI; you can check here: https://tree.taiga.io/project/taiga/issues?page=1 On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 12:18:13 PM UTC-4, Daniele Procida wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016, Daniele

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016, Daniele Procida wrote: >By all means it's useful to get votes on something like this, even >before we consider those questions, because if enough people want >something it's always possible - but be aware that simply getting lots >of votes for it would only ever be the first

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

onfluence.atlassian.com/jira/importing-data-from-trac-238617182.html >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 9:15:41 AM UTC-4, Daniele Procida >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016, Victor Sosa wrote: >>>>>

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

> > FWIW Jira seems to be an exception among bug trackers: some people really > love it, others really hate it. It depends on who set it up and maintained > it in the company where they used it. > > Since we don’t have a resident Jira expert, we run the risk that most of > the Django community will

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

> >I see so many open source project using Jira that is just natural. Search > >is easy, categorize is easy, look through the all issues and task is quick. > > > >I would like to propose a vote on Jira as the bugtracker for this project. > >Just vote + or - to

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

messy. I just don't feel >>>> >comfortable >>>> >with it. >>>> >I see so many open source project using Jira that is just natural. >>>> Search >>>> >is easy, categorize is easy, look through the all issues and task is >

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

Sosa wrote: >>> >>> >I felt like lost using trac; it is kind of messy. I just don't feel >>> >comfortable >>> >with it. >>> >I see so many open source project using Jira that is just natural. >>> Search >>> >is easy,

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

l >>> >comfortable >>> >with it. >>> >I see so many open source project using Jira that is just natural. >>> Search >>> >is easy, categorize is easy, look through the all issues and task is >>> quick. >>> > >>>

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

, look through the all issues and task is >> quick. >> > >> >I would like to propose a vote on Jira as the bugtracker for this >> project. >> >Just vote + or - to see how many people agree on this. >> >> Hi Victor. It's a reasonable propositio

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

ing Jira that is just natural. Search > >is easy, categorize is easy, look through the all issues and task is > quick. > > > >I would like to propose a vote on Jira as the bugtracker for this > project. > >Just vote + or - to see how many people agree on this. > > Hi

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

gorize is easy, look through the all issues and task is quick. > > I would like to propose a vote on Jira as the bugtracker for this project. > Just vote + or - to see how many people agree on this. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &

Re: Vote on Jira as bugtracker

task is quick. > >I would like to propose a vote on Jira as the bugtracker for this project. >Just vote + or - to see how many people agree on this. Hi Victor. It's a reasonable proposition, but it's not simply a case of choosing what would be nicer: we also have to make it wor

Vote on Jira as bugtracker

s the bugtracker for this project. Just vote + or - to see how many people agree on this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails f

Re: bugtracker

On 1/30/08, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Speaking of which, I see that link is included on the contributing > page, but not anywhere else. The "new ticket" page still recommends > using 'settings', which doesn't work quite as well. I've just changed that. Jacob --~--~-~--

Re: bugtracker

08 11:20 AM, onno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uhm, each time I want to post a bug via the bugtracker in the > documentation. I get a error "500, a potential spammer" is something > wrong. > > Here my bug: > > http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/authe

Re: bugtracker

If you register the spamfilters are disabled On Jan 30, 2008 5:20 PM, onno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uhm, each time I want to post a bug via the bugtracker in the > documentation. I get a error "500, a potential spammer" is something > wron

bugtracker

Uhm, each time I want to post a bug via the bugtracker in the documentation. I get a error "500, a potential spammer" is something wrong. Here my bug: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/authentication/#default-permissions The docs state that the permissions only show up &q