I'm no expert in this area, but perhaps we could use a thread-local
middleware to keep request handy?
Sort of like this wiki solution [1] but put the whole request into
_thread_locals.
Would there be any performance downside in doing that? Is it safe to
do that?
This would solve the reverse URL
On Jul 29, 10:19 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Reverse URL construction (especially w.r.t things like HTTP
> redirects) is the big missing part.
We obviously need some way to get the SCRIPT_NAME from request to the
reverse resolver. Can we rely on SCRIPT_NAME remaining a con
On Jul 29, 10:30 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 23:20 +, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > FWIW, I know I said that SCRIPT_NAME can't be calculated in
> > mod_python. Well, that isn't strictly true.
>
> > If you are using mod_python 3.3.1 and ha
On 7/28/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Haven't worked out exactly how to acommodate things like mod_python not
> giving the full SCRIPT_NAME yet, but it's a relatively minor issue since
> it's just a fact of life we need to work around. Something will present
> itself.
I'm no
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 23:20 +, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
[...]
> FWIW, I know I said that SCRIPT_NAME can't be calculated in
> mod_python. Well, that isn't strictly true.
>
> If you are using mod_python 3.3.1 and have used the Location directive
> then it is probably possible by using req.hlist
On Jul 29, 8:19 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 05:11 +, SmileyChris wrote:
> > Sorry bout the unfinished second half of that last message, I was just
> > thinking through type and I meant to delete it before posting.
>
> > On Jul 27, 4:16 pm, Graham D
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 05:11 +, SmileyChris wrote:
> Sorry bout the unfinished second half of that last message, I was just
> thinking through type and I meant to delete it before posting.
>
> On Jul 27, 4:16 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The other problem is that altho
On Jul 27, 5:09 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It sounds like you are saying then that the base.py change results in
> what I refer to as the desirable behaviour for urls.py.
Exactly. That change ensures that the url (forward) resolver doesn't
need to worry about SCRIPT_NAME (i
Sorry bout the unfinished second half of that last message, I was just
thinking through type and I meant to delete it before posting.
On Jul 27, 4:16 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The other problem is that although with the better WSGI adapters
> SCRIPT_NAME is provided correc
On Jul 27, 2:49 pm, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 4:16 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ahh, I read the way the patch was being applied the wrong way
> > around. :-(
>
> > Anyway, one potential reason why using req.uri may be bad is that
> > Apache does
On Jul 27, 4:16 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ahh, I read the way the patch was being applied the wrong way
> around. :-(
>
> Anyway, one potential reason why using req.uri may be bad is that
> Apache does not do complete normalisation on it. Thus, one can get
> repeating slash
On Jul 27, 1:32 pm, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2:51 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 27, 12:34 pm, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Reading through the mod_wsgi docs [1], I came to a section explaining
> > > a problem with Dj
On Jul 27, 2:51 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 27, 12:34 pm, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Reading through the mod_wsgi docs [1], I came to a section explaining
> > a problem with Django's core HTTP handling (search for "SCRIPT_NAME").
>
> > I have reopen
Here is last time this was discussed.
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_frm/thread/19cd0976a3010cba/5329aeb3960ceb70?lnk=gst&q=SCRIPT_NAME&rnum=2#5329aeb3960ceb70
Graham
On Jul 27, 12:51 pm, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jul 27, 12:34 pm, SmileyChris <[E
On Jul 27, 12:34 pm, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading through the mod_wsgi docs [1], I came to a section explaining
> a problem with Django's core HTTP handling (search for "SCRIPT_NAME").
>
> I have reopened #285 [2] and attached a patch which seemingly fixes
> this. Could I pleas
Reading through the mod_wsgi docs [1], I came to a section explaining
a problem with Django's core HTTP handling (search for "SCRIPT_NAME").
I have reopened #285 [2] and attached a patch which seemingly fixes
this. Could I please have some people more expert than me check it out
and provide some
16 matches
Mail list logo
