Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Mike Scott
I'm not a fan of this discussion, I understand what you're saying, and the simple importerror test should suffice, otherwise its going to get to a point where we're going to have to keep a list of python libraries that can't be used for app names. Its not going to work like that. As far as I'm con

Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Thejaswi Puthraya
On Mar 31, 9:08 pm, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 31, 7:36 pm, Thejaswi Puthraya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:> First, I am very sorry to have caused so much of pain to you. I > > totally overlooked your ticket (just missed it) in an urge to > > contribute during the sprint. W

Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Ivan Illarionov
On Mar 31, 7:36 pm, Thejaswi Puthraya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, I am very sorry to have caused so much of pain to you. I > totally overlooked your ticket (just missed it) in an urge to > contribute during the sprint. Will be careful from the next time. The > patch for ticket #6789 too wa

Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Thejaswi Puthraya
On Mar 31, 5:19 pm, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are people doing triage regularly to check for duplicates; > > however, there are a large number of tickets and this one -- as > > mentioned above -- happened during the development sprint when there > > was already a large a

Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Ivan Illarionov
> There are people doing triage regularly to check for duplicates; > however, there are a large number of tickets and this one -- as > mentioned above -- happened during the development sprint when there > was already a large amount of ticket activity. Try not to take it > personally or allege unf

Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread James Bennett
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Ivan Illarionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, I've just found that ticket #6789 was merged into trunk while my > ticket #6654 that was filed a month earlier and does the same thing > was ignored. The one that was checked in appears to have had its patch att

Re: Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Justin Lilly
Ivan, I'm sure the developers do check for duplicate tickets, but they're busy people. Not to mention with nearly a thousand tickets open, it can be difficult to remember all of them and easy to miss one. I might suggest coming here with an air of curiosity instead of an accusatory tone for best r

Unfair ticket management

2008-03-31 Thread Ivan Illarionov
Hey, I've just found that ticket #6789 was merged into trunk while my ticket #6654 that was filed a month earlier and does the same thing was ignored. My patch is still better because it removes INVALID_PROJECT_NAMES that became unnecessary -- all those names will be detected by __import__. Why