Crikey, I didn't even realize. Sorry!
I am subscribed to both with different users... again, apologies.
On May 2, 8:21 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 5/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Alright, perhaps the URL reverse lookup function has som
On 5/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alright, perhaps the URL reverse lookup function has something to do
> if a valid view exists. Hope I didn't waste anyones time, it does seem
> to be working now.
Glad you sorted out your problem. In future, could you please direct
queri
Alright, perhaps the URL reverse lookup function has something to do
if a valid view exists. Hope I didn't waste anyones time, it does seem
to be working now.
On May 2, 7:41 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I caught the thread from a long time ago about the URL not being able
I caught the thread from a long time ago about the URL not being able
to traverse included URLs. But I seem to be running into the issue
now.
I am in an application (app1) that has a base URL of "app1/". In the
view i'm using a template like this:
{% url app2.views.fn %}
The only thing the tag s
