Re: Ticket 16317 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16317

2012-03-18 Thread Simone Federici
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 17:19, ptone wrote: > If all looks OK, comment that you have done the above and mark "Ready for > checkin" Thanks Preston, I've update the patch a the current revision (the content is not changed) I'think is ready for checkin, test are included on fixtures testcases ht

Re: Ticket 16317 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16317

2012-03-18 Thread ptone
On Friday, March 16, 2012 7:00:32 AM UTC-7, Marcob wrote: > > The ticket 16317 has a very nice 4 months old patch (it's has a two > lines fix, remainder are just test fixes). > It was marked for 1.3 version but now it's better to change it to 1.4 > version. > As I really hate to patch django

Re: Ticket 16317 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16317

2012-03-17 Thread Simone Federici
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 15:00, Marcob wrote: > The ticket 16317 has a very nice 4 months old patch (it's has a two > lines fix, remainder are just test fixes). > It was marked for 1.3 version but now it's better to change it to 1.4 > version. > As I really hate to patch django I think my only sol

Ticket 16317 https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16317

2012-03-16 Thread Marcob
The ticket 16317 has a very nice 4 months old patch (it's has a two lines fix, remainder are just test fixes). It was marked for 1.3 version but now it's better to change it to 1.4 version. As I really hate to patch django I think my only solution is "to lobby" this ticket here :-) Is there anythin