On Mar 27, 2:46 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Ben Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What's the status on both of them? Do they still need to be finished?
>
> They are both defunct.
>
> > Do you think they would be good GSoC projects
Thanks for that info :) That looks very interesting. I wonder if
combining all three notions into one project is going to fit within
the time constraints of one summer, especially when you include things
like getting MtM fields working and testing. I think I'm going to
definitely run with it, t
Though search is of primary importance, object history is obviously
very important as well -- both auditing (Audit Log pattern) and
rolling back/comparing changes (Temporal Object pattern) are very
common use cases (see Martin Fowler's treatment of these and some
other patterns for things that cha
Interesting. I wasn't sure if it'd be valid since I believe in 2006
Search was a GSoC idea. I guess I assumed it wasn't going to be
considered since it has been 2 years since and it's not on the list
any more, but I did realize of course it doesn't exist. :D
I think I will likely take your repl
In my humble opinion a search abrastraction app bundled in
django.contrib is a really high priority and has suitable scope for a
SoC project. Qouting James http://www.djangosnippets.org/about/faq/:
"Why isn't there a search system?
Because no-one's yet written a good generic search system for Dja
Ben, I'd like to hijack, I hope you don't mind
I'm also trying to get a good GSoC project to submit. If I understand
right, even though a lot of commonly-used modules like registration
and search have third-party apps out there, a few of them might still
be fair game to try to implement in Djang
On 27 Mar 2008, at 19:46, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Still, the last
> 20% is enough work that a project making AuditTrail into a bonafide
> extension might be good.
Sorry, skipped over your last sentence before I sent the last message!
I will investigate AuditTrail some more...
Ben
--~--~--
On 27 Mar 2008, at 19:46, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> Starting from those branches? No. The state-of-the-art has moved on,
> and we've gotten wiser about how we maintain open projects. Search,
> for example, has a couple of third-party apps out there; working on
> any of 'em would make a good pr
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think they would be good GSoC projects?
> Starting from those branches? No. The state-of-the-art has moved on,
> and we've gotten wiser about how we maintain open projects. Search,
> for example, has a c
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Ben Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the status on both of them? Do they still need to be finished?
They are both defunct.
> Do you think they would be good GSoC projects?
Starting from those branches? No. The state-of-the-art has moved on,
and we'
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/TextIndexingAbstractionLayer
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/FullHistory
I see both were on the GSoC list for last year, but neither have been
touched in a year. On this list, the last mentions of both branches
were a while back too, and nothing conclusiv
11 matches
Mail list logo
