Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Cool. I'll have a look at it in detail. From a first read, though, it
> looks like a reasonable approach: building in cache management to the
> view. Why can't this be done using the normal CacheMiddleware, though?
>
I hadn't read the source on that; now I have. It's
On 3/8/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may be unlucky here in who chose to respond. There's evidence to
> suggest that I'm more of a hard-ass on this front than the other core
> developers, but only by a little bit.
Bah. Now I have to respond, because I've got a reputation
Hey Jeremy,
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 12:37 -0500, Jeremy Bowers wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> For concreteness, I've added a ticket and there is a code-only patch at
> http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/3680/cache.control.on.syndication.code.only.diff
>
> . The patch is exc
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
For concreteness, I've added a ticket and there is a code-only patch at
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/3680/cache.control.on.syndication.code.only.diff
. The patch is exceedingly lightly tested (I've only smoke tested it on
a local dev box, and I hav
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:33 -0500, Jeremy Bowers wrote:
> Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Since we already have middleware for attaching ETags (CommonMiddleware)
> > and supporting conditional GETs (ConditionalGetMiddleware), it would be
> > nice to work out why they aren't just doing the right thin
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Since we already have middleware for attaching ETags (CommonMiddleware)
> and supporting conditional GETs (ConditionalGetMiddleware), it would be
> nice to work out why they aren't just doing the right thing here.
I found ConditionalGetMiddleware before I wrote my extra
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 23:04 -0500, Jeremy Bowers wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, the syndication framework does not have
> the ability to return HTTP 304 in response to unchanged feeds. This is bad.
>
> I've worked up a solution locally which I'd like to get feedback on, and
> a couple q
Unless I'm missing something, the syndication framework does not have
the ability to return HTTP 304 in response to unchanged feeds. This is bad.
I've worked up a solution locally which I'd like to get feedback on, and
a couple questions.
Currently, I've got this:
* The feed class is slightly
