Hi John,
In case that’s not clear from the answers above, your question roughly
translates to “can you do dozens of hours of very boring work and increase your
maintenance workload in the future for no discernible benefit to you, just
because I ask?” There’s no way that could be met with a posi
No we can't (at least not till we drop python 2). You are free to write
your own stub files though, this can easily live as a separate repo for now
imo…
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 3:22:17 PM UTC+2, John Michael Lafayette
wrote:
>
> Python now has static type checking. All you do is follow
It supports a mode that is comparable with Python 2.x, but which isn’t as nice.
You essentially need to ship additional stub files that just have the type
hints in them.
On October 11, 2015 at 1:13:20 PM, Collin Anderson (cmawebs...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi John,
I think we need to wait until we d
Hi John,
I think we need to wait until we drop Python 2.x support to be able to do
this, as 2.x won't accept this syntax. Does that sound right?
Thanks,
Collin
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 9:22:17 AM UTC-4, John Michael Lafayette
wrote:
>
> Python now has static type checking. All you do is
Python now has static type checking. All you do is follow function parameters
with ": paramType" and add "-> returnType" before the colon at the end of the
function declaration and auto-complete will work on the return value in
IntelliJ. Can you add the function parameter types and return type
