On 15 juil. 2013, at 03:20, Ramiro Morales wrote:
> Would it be worth look at the web server log to see if these comments
> were effectively created by HTTP POST requests at all?
As far as I can tell, the spammer is using regular requests. While he has a
browser-like user-agent, he's using HTTP
On Monday, July 15, 2013 3:20:16 AM UTC+2, Ramiro Morales wrote:
>
> Would it be worth look at the web server log to see if these comments
> were effectively created by HTTP POST requests at all?
>
That's what I did to figure out the ip (which I blocked via iptables before
Aymeric played with
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that bypassed
> Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and deleting it
> manually gets tedious after 100 messages, I hacked Trac to prevent furth
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that
> bypassed Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and
> deleting it manually gets tedious after 100 mess
Hello,
For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that bypassed
Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and deleting it
manually gets tedious after 100 messages, I hacked Trac to prevent further
comments on this ticket.
I'm positive that Trac's antispam work
