Re: Sorting UX question

2011-06-09 Thread Idan Gazit
Jannis and I are sprinting on this; we'd like to take a 2nd look at potential behaviors after a long conversation yesterday. The current solution works, but I think there's still a lot of room for user confusion. Plan is to look again at existing sorting implementations (on various apps/platfor

Re: Sorting UX question

2011-06-09 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > In the new admin sorting UI, which now supports sorting on multiple > fields, the behaviour can be described by the following two rules: > > 1. If you click on a header, it is made the primary sort field >   (with others moved down the list as n

Re: Sorting UX question

2011-06-08 Thread Julien Phalip
On Jun 9, 9:45 am, Luke Plant wrote: > In the new admin sorting UI, which now supports sorting on multiple > fields, the behaviour can be described by the following two rules: > > 1. If you click on a header, it is made the primary sort field >    (with others moved down the list as necessary). >

Sorting UX question

2011-06-08 Thread Luke Plant
In the new admin sorting UI, which now supports sorting on multiple fields, the behaviour can be described by the following two rules: 1. If you click on a header, it is made the primary sort field (with others moved down the list as necessary). 2. If you click on a header that was already par