On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:55:03PM -0500, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> > One other enhancement I thought might be good is to have a
> > Model.pre_init signal
>
> Such a signal exists already last I looked, same for post_init.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:55:03PM -0500, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> One other enhancement I thought might be good is to have a
> Model.pre_init signal
Such a signal exists already last I looked, same for post_init...
Please clarify.
> Other similar class-based
> receiver lists might speed things up
Ticket #6814 is working to improve signal performance.
Feature tradeoffs:
Strong/weak receiver connections - strong-only is a big win-- about 2x
performance. Any receivers going out of scope (and not to be called)
should be explicitly disconnected if we remove support for weak
receivers.
.send
