Will do. Piston looks pretty cool.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googleg
Use Django Piston. It will make your life a ton easier.
Cheers,
Eric
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:48 AM, orokusaki wrote:
> Addendum: I might be simply abusing `serialize`. I'm using it as a
> Django compatible `json.dumps` in order to provide a JSON API from my
> models to my JSON-RPC client. The
@Everyone I apologize if I came across as using hyperbole or idiotic.
I never said I was hushed here, not even one time. I was hushed on
code.django and sent here. Yes hushed might be a bit of an
exaggeration, somebody basically closed my ticket and says go get
consensus before reopening a ticket,
Addendum: I might be simply abusing `serialize`. I'm using it as a
Django compatible `json.dumps` in order to provide a JSON API from my
models to my JSON-RPC client. There seems to be no more extensible
way. If this isn't one of the intended uses, let me know and I'll
leave it alone. Again I apolo
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:43 PM, orokusaki wrote:
> Thank you Karen. I've been hushed so many times about this [...]
I can't find any evidence that this is the case. In fact, this appears
to be your first post on django-developers.
Since you're (apparently) new here, I'm happy to cut you some s
On Monday 15 February 2010 21:53:37 orokusaki wrote:
> The problem comes when you're writing
> your outside code (JavaScript, et all) against the API you've now
> built. You need something like user[0].first_name instead of just
> user.first_name. It's not a huge coding difference. It just see
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:43 PM, orokusaki wrote:
> Thank you Karen. I've been hushed so many times about this, yet there
> seems to be a growing concern (hence the search traffic, and number of
> results) about why you can't naturally do this with Django's built-in
> serializer.
I have no proble
Thank you Karen. I've been hushed so many times about this, yet there
seems to be a growing concern (hence the search traffic, and number of
results) about why you can't naturally do this with Django's built-in
serializer.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Gary Reynolds
wrote:
> There is already a ticket for this (and possibly others).
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11244#comment:4
>
> It has been closed and marked wontfix, see the comments for why.
I believe the request here is to reconsider that wontfix
There is already a ticket for this (and possibly others).
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11244#comment:4
It has been closed and marked wontfix, see the comments for why.
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:53, orokusaki wrote:
Please visit the following URL, and when you do, put your focus into
the
Please visit the following URL, and when you do, put your focus into
the search form after "seri" and type the letter "a". You'll notice
the top search for anything related to Django serialization is "Single
Object". This is because people want to have this feature. Serializing
a single object can
11 matches
Mail list logo
