On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, this just highlights why it's important to have a policy
> for acknowledging receipt of a security vuln. If I knew I should
> expect a reply regardless, I probably would have re-sent this a week
> ago.
Yup; I'll add somet
Ok, re-sent :)
Of course, this just highlights why it's important to have a policy
for acknowledging receipt of a security vuln. If I knew I should
expect a reply regardless, I probably would have re-sent this a week
ago.
-bob
On Oct 7, 2:30 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
Hey Bob --
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submitted a possible low-risk security issue about 2 weeks ago to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have not received a response.
Damn, I'm sorry about that! I don't see your email in the security
inbox anywhere, so it's possib
I submitted a possible low-risk security issue about 2 weeks ago to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and have not received a response. I'm
assuming this means that it is not being acknowledged as a
vulnerability, but I'm not sure how long I'm expected to wait before
posting it as a regular bug on Trac.
The docu