Re: SMTPConnection DeprecationWarning

2009-12-03 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > On Thursday 03 December 2009 14:36:42 Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > >> > Also, I think it ought to be noted (along with a few other >> > things) in the "Features deprecated in 1.2" section of >> > docs/releases/1.2.txt >> >> Yes it should - but t

Re: SMTPConnection DeprecationWarning

2009-12-03 Thread Luke Plant
On Thursday 03 December 2009 14:36:42 Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > Also, I think it ought to be noted (along with a few other > > things) in the "Features deprecated in 1.2" section of > > docs/releases/1.2.txt > > Yes it should - but this time, in my defense, the 1.2 release notes > didn't exi

Re: SMTPConnection DeprecationWarning

2009-12-03 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Luke Plant wrote: > Hi all, > > With the addition of the configurable email backend functionality, > SMTPConnection is raising a DeprecationWarning.  Shouldn't this be a > PendingDeprecationWarning according to our procedure? Yes, it should. That's an oversight on

SMTPConnection DeprecationWarning

2009-12-03 Thread Luke Plant
Hi all, With the addition of the configurable email backend functionality, SMTPConnection is raising a DeprecationWarning. Shouldn't this be a PendingDeprecationWarning according to our procedure? Also, I think it ought to be noted (along with a few other things) in the "Features deprecated i