On 4/15/06, Jason Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think generic views still need to be updated, see ticket #1643 .
Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up.
Adrian
--
Adrian Holovaty
holovaty.com | djangoproject.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 4/14/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do you think of the idea (proposed by Luke Plant here:
> > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500 ) to remove the
> > TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION setting, so that you'd have to specify ".html"
> > in each get_t
On 4/14/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think of the idea (proposed by Luke Plant here:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500 ) to remove the
> TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION setting, so that you'd have to specify ".html"
> in each get_template() call?
OK, I've committe
+1.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/15/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any huge objections?
+1 from me.
-0 on the 'default' lookup option proposed. The only benefit I can see
to having the extension optional is during the 0.91->MR transition
phase, where you have template calls that haven't been updated.
R
+1 on the original proposal
-0 on making it an optional setting
--
Petar Marić
*e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*mobile: +381 (64) 6122467
*icq: 224720322
*skype: petar_maric
*web: http://www.petarmaric.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you a
Op vr, 14-04-2006 te 14:37 -0500, schreef Adrian Holovaty:
> What do you think of the idea (proposed by Luke Plant here:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500 ) to remove the
> TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION setting, so that you'd have to specify ".html"
> in each get_template() call?
+1
--
Jan
Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nebojsa Djordjevic wrote:
>>>
>>> Any huge objections?
>>
>> No, +1 from me.
>>
>> Maybe this can be made optional somehow.
>
> Me too. :-) I like it but I want it to be optional with "*.html" as
> default.
On the original proposal: +1, It makes thi
Nebojsa Djordjevic wrote:
>>
>> Any huge objections?
>
> No, +1 from me.
>
> Maybe this can be made optional somehow.
Me too. :-) I like it but I want it to be optional with "*.html" as default.
Thanks,
Eugene
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
Nebojsa Djordjevic wrote:
>>
>> Any huge objections?
>
> No, +1 from me.
>
> Maybe this can be made optional somehow.
Me too. :-) I like it but I want it to be optional with "*.html" as default.
Thanks,
Eugene
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> What do you think of the idea (proposed by Luke Plant here:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500 ) to remove the
> TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION setting, so that you'd have to specify ".html"
> in each get_template() call?
>
> I like it, because it solves the problem of w
What do you think of the idea (proposed by Luke Plant here:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/500 ) to remove the
TEMPLATE_FILE_EXTENSION setting, so that you'd have to specify ".html"
in each get_template() call?
I like it, because it solves the problem of wanting to use other
extensions, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
