On 6/7/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternatively (and I suspect this is a variation on what Marty is
> suggesting), move all the url processing bit out of __call__() and into
> a function that __call__ calls. Then that function can be overridden in
> the subclass. Notice th
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 19:07 -0500, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For my policy work, I'd like to be able to add in a separate URL
> > handler within each model's registration, so that something like
> > /admin/app/policy/ and /admin/app/model/poli
On 6/7/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running into this problem/limitation in trying to fix
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4450 -- the previous (trunk)
> admin overrides the admin URLconf value for "/auth/user/" as a special
> case, and newforms-admin doesn't do that
On 5/28/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For my policy work, I'd like to be able to add in a separate URL
> handler within each model's registration, so that something like
> /admin/app/policy/ and /admin/app/model/policy/ would give editors
> customized for that location. However, I'
On 5/28/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that "extra" things on a model in whatever form they may take
> are either instance-specific, in which case they are Field sub-classes
> -- for database-backed data -- or methods, or they are model-specific
> (e.g. django-values'
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 11:48 +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 21:36 -0400, Marty Alchin wrote:
> > On 5/28/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Aren't you asking the wrong question here? The real issue seems to be
> > > "how is admin going to handle arbitr
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 21:36 -0400, Marty Alchin wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aren't you asking the wrong question here? The real issue seems to be
> > "how is admin going to handle arbitrary Field classes that it doesn't
> > otherwise know about?"
>
> Wel
On 5/28/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aren't you asking the wrong question here? The real issue seems to be
> "how is admin going to handle arbitrary Field classes that it doesn't
> otherwise know about?"
Well, I'm not worried about Field classes. DurationField, for
instance
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 15:55 -0400, Marty Alchin wrote:
> In working with my recent contrib saga, I've been looking a bit into
> newforms-admin, since it's going to be merged someday, and it looks
> like it would give me some better options. However, one thing I was
> hoping for doesn't seem to be
