Re: Ticket 3505, Authentication backend

2007-07-18 Thread Mario Gonzalez
On Jul 13, 1:04 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > defines AUTH_BACKENDS to be a string, not a tuple, and that is the > error you are catching (note the missing comma). Note the missing > comma. If you have the comma in the tuple, Django correctly reports > that the backend doe

Re: Ticket 3505, Authentication backend

2007-07-12 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 7/12/07, Mario Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in my settings file I set AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS = ('something.that- > doesnot.exists') so when you use the authenticate() method in some > view a ValueError is raised. So, my patch catch that exception in > load_backend() method. > > I

Re: Ticket 3505, Authentication backend

2007-07-12 Thread Mario Gonzalez
On 11 jul, 22:33, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > if AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS is empty or something is wrong then > > nothing is detected, only an ImporError. The patch catch the > > ValueError. > > Where and how is the error revealed? When you import an application? > When

Re: Ticket 3505, Authentication backend

2007-07-11 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 7/11/07, mario__ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11 jul, 00:09, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Can you help out a little bit here by providing a test case (not > > necessarily a unit test - just a clear set of instructions for how to > > generate they type of error

Re: Ticket 3505, Authentication backend

2007-07-11 Thread mario__
On 11 jul, 00:09, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you help out a little bit here by providing a test case (not > necessarily a unit test - just a clear set of instructions for how to > generate they type of error that your patch proposes to catch? I can > see the general p

Re: Ticket 3505, Authentication backend

2007-07-10 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 7/11/07, mario__ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Please take a look at this url http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3505 > I wrote a little patch for the ticket subject. Comments or kicks will > be appreciated :-) Can you help out a little bit here by providing a test case (not necessarily