Re: Standalon Django ORM

2022-12-13 Thread Carlton Gibson
I think we already have this no? See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.1/ref/databases/#s-third-party-notes for a list of 3rd party DB backends. On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 10:31, Vasanth Mohan wrote: > I second Jörg about better maintainability with tighter integrations. > > However, for the fun

Re: Standalon Django ORM

2022-12-13 Thread Vasanth Mohan
I second Jörg about better maintainability with tighter integrations. However, for the fun of stirring the pot, what's the opinion on letting Django define an API for the ORM and letting a library deal with the DB-specific implementation that generates the SQL for query? Django could have a li

Re: Standalon Django ORM

2022-12-12 Thread Jörg Breitbart
I tend to believe the opposite is true. Django was/is a successor in its field, because it offers an "out-of-the-box" or "batteries included" experience. Subsequently parts were shaped as needed for that bigger picture, e.g. the ORM became what it is today. Does anyone still remember django ve