On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 5:17:11 PM UTC+2, Shai Berger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 16 November 2013 21:02:00 Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> > Any feedback for pre/post_update idea?
> >
> As Loic said, the signals sound like they can be useful in a variety of
> situations. A couple of note
Hi,
On Saturday 16 November 2013 21:02:00 Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> Any feedback for pre/post_update idea?
>
As Loic said, the signals sound like they can be useful in a variety of
situations. A couple of notes, though:
> pre_update listeners get a queryset that isn't executed.
The "query" par
On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:02 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> - Reverse ForeignKey .remove() will not use .save() - it will use .update()
> - so no model save signals, and overridden model.save() is missed, too.
+1 on the pre/post_update signals as they can be useful for a variety of
purposes.
Al
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 11:40:37 PM UTC+3, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote:
> Here is the full list of changes that potential for breaking user code:
> - If related object's default manager has default filtering, then
> .remove() and .clear() will not clear those items that are filtered out.
> -
