On 12/01/2010 05:05 PM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
from django.conf import settings
def without_localization(view):
@wraps(view):
def decorated(*args, **kwargs):
# NOTE: I'm assuming this will actually have any effect -
settings caching is a different issue
old_value, sett
On 1 December 2010 14:37, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 04:26 PM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>>
>> What about view decorators?
>>
>> I don't want to invent use cases here, but if I right now have a view
>> decorator that on it's way out changes something that could alter how
>> a template is ren
On 12/01/2010 04:26 PM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
What about view decorators?
I don't want to invent use cases here, but if I right now have a view
decorator that on it's way out changes something that could alter how
a template is rendered (like current language, some settings or the
database conte
On 1 December 2010 13:51, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 02:52 PM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
>>
>> Lots of people find render_to_response so verbose, that they are using
>> direct_to_template() view instead. Django 1.3 deprecates that one, so
>> it would be fair to offer those people a replaceme
On 12/01/2010 02:52 PM, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
Lots of people find render_to_response so verbose, that they are using
direct_to_template() view instead. Django 1.3 deprecates that one, so
it would be fair to offer those people a replacement. Forcing them at
the same time into the world of lazy bak
On 1 December 2010 11:41, burc...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Mikhail Korobov
>> wrote:
>>> Just for the record: I'm with Ivan here and think that
>>>
>>> from django.template.response import
On 12/01/2010 01:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
I'd argue it doesn't simplify anything. It saves you a grand total of
10 characters (plus a couple more on import), but at the cost of the
added complexity of having two ways of doing *exactly* the same thing.
There is also a loss of explicitness
Hi Russell,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Mikhail Korobov
> wrote:
>> Just for the record: I'm with Ivan here and think that
>>
>> from django.template.response import TemplateResponse
>> def my_view(request):
>> return TemplateR
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Mikhail Korobov wrote:
> Just for the record: I'm with Ivan here and think that
>
> from django.template.response import TemplateResponse
> def my_view(request):
> return TemplateResponse(request, 'foo.html')
>
> is worse than
>
> from django.shortcuts import ren
Just for the record: I'm with Ivan here and think that
from django.template.response import TemplateResponse
def my_view(request):
return TemplateResponse(request, 'foo.html')
is worse than
from django.shortcuts import render
def my_view(request):
return render(request, 'foo.html')
I th
I agree with Jacob on the bake/baked thing.. but maybe it's just
CakePHP coming to haunt me :S
On Nov 29, 1:09 pm, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 02:58 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> > My counterargument would be this -- if you use TemplateResponse,
> > there's no need to use a shortcu
On 11/29/2010 02:58 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
My counterargument would be this -- if you use TemplateResponse,
there's no need to use a shortcut at all.
Yes, this is what I understood from your reasoning. I'm concerned more
with documentation. Namely, what are we going to suggest for usag
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 10:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> For your consideration, I present a patch to resolve #12815 and
>> #12816, adding a TemplateResponse and a render() shortcut.
>
> Thank you!
>
>> - The render() shortcut doesn't use Te
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi Russ --
>
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> For your consideration, I present a patch to resolve #12815 and
>> #12816, adding a TemplateResponse and a render() shortcut.
>
> Good stuff.
>
> A couple o
On 11/28/2010 10:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
For your consideration, I present a patch to resolve #12815 and
#12816, adding a TemplateResponse and a render() shortcut.
Thank you!
- The render() shortcut doesn't use TemplateResponse. Since render()
and TemplateReponse() have exactly th
*very nice* Russ. Congrats and thanks! Totally removes a wart I've
just got used to working around.
"bake" is a pretty universal verb for this, afaict. I wouldn't say it
was clever or new. "fry" however (in Jacob's post) was new to me and
required googling.
Ian.
--
You received this message bec
Hi Russ --
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> For your consideration, I present a patch to resolve #12815 and
> #12816, adding a TemplateResponse and a render() shortcut.
Good stuff.
A couple of things though:
* I'm really not a fan of "bake()" and ".baked" -- it rea
17 matches
Mail list logo
