2018-01-05 19:24 GMT+01:00 Tim Graham :
> Preservation of dict ordering is guaranteed in Python 3.7+ so that
> officially fixes this, correct?
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-December/151283.html
Sure, I can wait for that. Sorry for the noise, I should read that
list more often
Is this what you are looking for?
from django.http import QueryDict
from collections import OrderedDict
class OrderedQueryDict(QueryDict, OrderedDict):
pass
my_dict = OrderedQueryDict(request.META['QUERY_STRING'])
print my_dict.items()
On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 5:07:41 PM UTC+2, Ole
Preservation of dict ordering is guaranteed in Python 3.7+ so that
officially fixes this, correct?
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-December/151283.html
On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 1:14:03 PM UTC-5, Ole Laursen wrote:
>
> 2018-01-05 17:12 GMT+01:00 Tim Graham >:
> > Hi, Did yo
2018-01-05 17:12 GMT+01:00 Tim Graham :
> Hi, Did you try writing a patch? I naively tried "class
> MultiValueDict(OrderedDict):" as the only change and it doesn't pass the
> tests. Perhaps more adaptations are required.
Tried just now, and yeah it takes a little more adaptation.
MultiValueDict is
Hi, Did you try writing a patch? I naively tried "class
MultiValueDict(OrderedDict):" as the only change and it doesn't pass the
tests. Perhaps more adaptations are required.
As for the motivation, I'm not sure if you described the problem in enough
detail. (i.e. what does "It makes highly dyna
