I am also in favour. Thanks for explaining Barry.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 11:22, Carlton Gibson
wrote:
> OK, thanks all, let's reopen. These kind of wontfix+MailingList issues is
> more about getting more eyes on it than anything else, and the explanation
> you've given is super Barry.
>
> C.
> O
OK, thanks all, let's reopen. These kind of wontfix+MailingList issues is
more about getting more eyes on it than anything else, and the explanation
you've given is super Barry.
C.
On Sunday, 17 October 2021 at 09:59:18 UTC+2 Aymeric Augustin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 15 Oct 2021, at 08:49, Barr
Hello,
> On 15 Oct 2021, at 08:49, Barry Johnson wrote:
>
> Instead of resolving this difference in keys by executing:
> setattr(self, field.attname, obj.pk)
> We believe it should instead:
> setattr(self, field.name, obj)
For anyone reading this, this code is
https://github.com/django
On Friday, October 15, 2021 at 12:39:52 PM UTC-5 pyt...@ian.feete.org wrote:
> You set out a good case, it's much easier to understand the "why" here
than in the original ticket.
Yes. It was hard to compress the matter down small enough to reasonably
fit in a Trac entry, so skipped the vast ma
Hi Barry,
Based on this I'm cautiously in favour. You set out a good case, it's much
easier to understand the "why" here than in the original ticket.
I'd avoid the extra optimisation of accessing __dict__ directly though - if
__set__ gains extra functionality, I'd prefer not to accidentally miss
