Created a ticket with the patch: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17449
--
Steven
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Steven Cummings wrote:
> I'll probably go ahead and log it and start the patch soon. Your feedback
> on truncation for HTTP HEAD was helpful, and the rest doesn't seem very
> c
I'll probably go ahead and log it and start the patch soon. Your feedback
on truncation for HTTP HEAD was helpful, and the rest doesn't seem very
controversial.
--
Steven
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Jamie Matthews wrote:
> Just bumping this - can anyone suggest what the next steps should be
Just bumping this - can anyone suggest what the next steps should be?
It'd be nice to get it fixed for 1.4.
Thanks,
Jamie
On Nov 28, 5:59 pm, Jamie Matthews wrote:
> > Yeah, that implementation seems preferable. What was the reason for backing
> > it out?
>
> Not sure. What would be the procedu
I assumed I needed the votes here to get going on that. In the past when
I've started with a ticket I've been directed here to gather support first.
--
Steven
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Jamie Matthews
wrote:
> > Yeah, that implementation seems preferable. What was the reason for
> backing
> Yeah, that implementation seems preferable. What was the reason for backing
> it out?
Not sure. What would be the procedure for getting this changed? Open a
new ticket, I assume?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Jamie Matthews wrote:
> > 2. Improve the default HTTP HEAD handler by ensuring it has a blank body,
> > as this is the expectation of a response to a HEAD request. Also, there
> > should be consideration for the GET handler not existing, which should
> > result in
> 2. Improve the default HTTP HEAD handler by ensuring it has a blank body,
> as this is the expectation of a response to a HEAD request. Also, there
> should be consideration for the GET handler not existing, which should
> result in a 405. The code appears to assume it exists, which would result