On 15 Nov 2007, at 4:24 pm, Ryan K wrote:
>
> I've just implemented the django.contrib.comments system for my site
> which is actually a great package that doesn't seem to be used by many
> people. Does anyone have any plans to update the system? Some basic
> configuration stuff seems to be miss
+1
I like the simplicity and flexibility this approach provides. One
question - if the "Comment" is generalized to become a vehicle for any
user-supplied attribute (text comment, tag/label, star rating, etc.) to
an arbitrary contenttype, I can see having several "Comment"
(sub)classes that can d
James Bennett wrote:
> My personal preference would be to specify an interface that comments
> have to implement, and then let the actual model be whatever the
> developer wants; maybe a subclass of django.contib.models.Comment,
> maybe not. That feels like it'd give the maximum flexibility, and a
On 10/26/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might also be possible to achieve the same with model inheritance
> because the way we have decided to expose that is via an attribute on
> the base model. So if MyComment was a subclass of Comment, a Comment
> instance would have a m
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:29 -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> James Bennett wrote:
> > On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be
> >> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work
> >> on a patch
James Bennett wrote:
> On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be
>> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work
>> on a patch (or at least get started in the right direction) if there
>> w
On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be
> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work
> on a patch (or at least get started in the right direction) if there
> were some goals and ideas on
