Great. Thanks Jon. I will follow up there next week.
On Saturday, 11 February 2023, Jon Janzen wrote:
> Hey Carlton,
>
> Sorry I skipped over the suggestion in one of your earlier messages to
> post on the Forum.
>
> I’ve done so now: https://forum.djangoproject.com/t/
> asyncifying-django-contr
Hey Carlton,
Sorry I skipped over the suggestion in one of your earlier messages to post on
the Forum.
I’ve done so now:
https://forum.djangoproject.com/t/asyncifying-django-contrib-auth-and-signals-and-maybe-sessions/18770
I think we can consider this thread deprecated in favor of the above F
No plan ever survives first contact with the enemy :) but, this seems
reasonable to me Jon, yes.
Can I suggest we move further discussion on details to the Forum's async
category? It's nicer, better contained, and we more likely to catch
interested eyes.
Thanks for pursuing this! 🎁
On Thu, 9 Feb
Hey Carlton,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments, a few things come to mind:
A. It sounds like we’re in agreement about the utility and severability of
Phase 1 (just creating an async_to_sync-based wrapper around the auth
interface). I want to make sure I don’t cause extra work on the bug trac
Hi Jon.
Thanks for this.
I think your use-case is reasonable, and that you're basically on the
right track.
If you were to add test cases to your PoC, there's certainly a case for
looking seriously at it.
It should be reasonable to keep pushing the interfaces down one layer at a
time. (See commen
Hey,
Sorry about the delay in my response, holidays came early and stayed late for
me this year.
> TBH I'd prefer it if you pondered the design here without opening a ticket
> until such a point (if ever) that you have a concrete plan. (We'd likely just
> close it as wontfix unless there's a s
> But I can file a ticket just to track this one?
TBH I'd prefer it if you pondered the design here without opening a ticket
until such a point (if ever) that you have a concrete plan. (We'd likely
just close it as wontfix unless there's a specific idea on the table
anyway, so it's just noise at t
Hey Carlton,
There's: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31949 "Allow builtin view
> decorators to be applied directly to async views."
> I think this is likely the next step.
>
> There's a PR for that, which I think took a too complex approach (see
> discussion). A simpler (more inline) take b
Hi Jon.
There's: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31949 "Allow builtin view
decorators to be applied directly to async views."
I think this is likely the next step.
There's a PR for that, which I think took a too complex approach (see
discussion). A simpler (more inline) take be good to see.
