-1.
The only issue that I have with sites is that the default site should
be 127.0.0.1:8000 since that's what runserver defaults to. Putting
example.com as SITE_ID 1 only makes novice django developers shout and
throw things because like me they 'add 127.0.0.1:8000 and delete
example.com' instead
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Felipe Prenholato
wrote:
> About idea of use settings.py to set a default site, -1
> About ask to user what is yours default site, +1
> This thing only runs at syncdb, so I really don't think that a entry in
> settings.py is needed.
This seems a controversial top
About idea of use settings.py to set a default site, -1
About ask to user what is yours default site, +1
This thing only runs at syncdb, so I really don't think that a entry in
settings.py is needed.
2010/5/18 Oldřich Jedlička
> Hi,
>
> 2010/3/19 dalore
>
> Because of this thread I decided to
Hi,
2010/3/19 dalore
> Because of this thread I decided to release a little app we have been
> using internally. It's a straightforward way to modify the default
> site object.
>
> More details: http://oppian.com/labs/django-defaultsite/
>
> Any comments/suggestions welcome.
>
I've just got to
Because of this thread I decided to release a little app we have been
using internally. It's a straightforward way to modify the default
site object.
More details: http://oppian.com/labs/django-defaultsite/
Any comments/suggestions welcome.
Sincerely
Matthew Jacobi
Oppian Systems Ltd
On Mar 12,
On Mar 15, 10:44 am, Yuri Baburov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> How do you like the following idea:
> startproject command puts a fixture for django.contrib.sites (and
> fixture for superuser probably) to the root folder or whatever, to be
> loaded with syncdb?
> That way also encourage users to get mor
There is a ticket for something similar #8896
(http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8896).
Let urlresolvers also route according to hostname.
-- Gert
Mobile: +32 498725202
Web: http://gert.selentic.net
2010/3/15 jens :
> On Mar 15, 3:44 pm, Yuri Baburov wrote:
>> How do you like the following
On Mar 15, 3:44 pm, Yuri Baburov wrote:
> How do you like the following idea:
> startproject command puts a fixture for django.contrib.sites (and
> fixture for superuser probably) to the root folder or whatever, to be
> loaded with syncdb?
IMHO it would be a great, if django can set the SITE_ID d
I guess at some point its just feature-clut. Its a use case we _could_
encompass, but would you really even find yourself using it?
I don't see the technical difference here--pre-syncdb, you either have
to 'wade' to the database or you have to 'wade' to this item in
settings.py. Its not as though
Fair enough. As Gabriel pointed out earlier, I didn't realize that I
could change those values by adding django.contrib.sites to my
INSTALLED_APPS. That's why I said there was no straightforward way of
configuring those values.
I wish Django had some sort of 'sample proposals' on their site. You
s
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> I'm not arguing that the proposal is inherently bad, just that it was
> being proposed without understanding the existing solution.
> Personally, I use a custom model that inherits from Site to manage my
> sites, so it's not like I'm thrill
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> I'm not arguing that the proposal is inherently bad, just that it was
> being proposed without understanding the existing solution.
That's not what I got from your harsh responses.
The existing "solution" is to modify the default Site cre
I'm not arguing that the proposal is inherently bad, just that it was
being proposed without understanding the existing solution.
Personally, I use a custom model that inherits from Site to manage my
sites, so it's not like I'm thrilled with the current system either.
I would actually be +0 on add
A fixture won't really solve the problem. I'm okay with Gabriel's
solution though. It is not as simple as my proposal, but certainly
more elegant.
Aditya
On Mar 13, 6:57 am, Chuck Harmston wrote:
> This particular use case (having predefined sets of information loaded into
> the database on eith
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Chuck Harmston wrote:
> This particular use case (having predefined sets of information loaded into
> the database on either syncdb or other command) is what Django's fixture
> loading/creation system is for.
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/django-admin/
> Does this proposal add any functionality that fixtures do not already
> provide?
Convenience. It moves the definition of the site away from the
database, and away from fixtures files and into the settings.
Personally, I am yet to need multiple sites for a single database, and
would much prefer b
This particular use case (having predefined sets of information loaded into
the database on either syncdb or other command) is what Django's fixture
loading/creation system is for.
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/django-admin/#what-s-a-fixture
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/howto/in
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> "domain = Site.objects.get_current().domain"
>
> The "Site" model in that code comes from the
> django.contrib.sites.models, part of the Sites framework I mentioned
> above. This is not some bizarre buried database mishap; this is the
> app
"domain = Site.objects.get_current().domain"
The "Site" model in that code comes from the
django.contrib.sites.models, part of the Sites framework I mentioned
above. This is not some bizarre buried database mishap; this is the
app developer taking advantage of a contrib app that is included in
Dja
Could you be more specific? I'm not sure what you mean.
Aditya
On Mar 12, 5:26 pm, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> You seem to be missing the point of the code you reference above. You
> should probably read up on the "Sites" framework that ships with
> Django:
>
> http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/re
You seem to be missing the point of the code you reference above. You
should probably read up on the "Sites" framework that ships with
Django:
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/sites/
All the best,
- Gabriel
On Mar 12, 1:39 pm, aditya wrote:
> Description
> =
> This
21 matches
Mail list logo
