I think Russell put it very well in pointing out that one of the few
big technological impediments in Trac is that there isn't an easy way
to see the last-modification time of tickets. Particularly to the
point that it's hard to tell when a new patch is uploaded and an
accepted ticket might need ne
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tai Lee wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> On Oct 5, 11:48 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
>> > Perhaps we need another triage stage for these tickets, "Needs final
>> > review" or something?
>>
>> That's essentially what RFC is. This is an area where our documented
>> proce
Hi Russ,
On Oct 5, 11:48 am, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> There have been a couple of suggestions recently that the contributing
> guide should be distilled into a specific HOWTO for new users. I
> suppose the idea here would be for the contribution guide to be the
> letter of the law, and the H
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Tai Lee wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>> For (1) check out http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Reports(it's
>> linked in the nav). If there's anything missing there, please feel
>> free to add it -- it's a wiki page. Let me know if you need help
Hi Jacob,
Thanks for your feedback.
> For (1) check out http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Reports(it's
> linked in the nav). If there's anything missing there, please feel
> free to add it -- it's a wiki page. Let me know if you need help
> figuring out the linked query syntax.
I wasn't able to
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Tai Lee wrote:
> I'd like to suggest (1) easy to find and use pre-defined searches to
> find tickets at each stage of triage, (2) a clearer indication of the
> next steps and the person responsible for it whenever a ticket is
> reviewed, and (3) tickets that have be
On Sep 30, 7:22 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> What is also needed is a whole lot more people volunteering. Any
> suggestions on how to get more people doing the entirely unglamorous,
> but completely necessary work will be gratefully accepted.
I'd like to suggest (1) easy to find and use pre-
On 09/30/2010 01:22 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
So, let me be clear on what you're proposing: you acknowledge that the
triage process is backlogged. Your proposal is to put extra workload
onto the core team - the one group that is already a bottleneck in the
process.
Pretty much. I just don'
On Thursday, September 30, 2010, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 03:46 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> Accepted tickets can be:
>
> * Purely accepted, indicating that someone has verified that the
> problem exists, but not how to solve it
>
> * Accepted with a patch that is wrong in so
On 09/30/2010 03:46 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
Accepted tickets can be:
* Purely accepted, indicating that someone has verified that the
problem exists, but not how to solve it
* Accepted with a patch that is wrong in some way (e.g., fixing the
symptom, not the problem)
* Accepted wi
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Waylan Limberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 01:32 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
>>>
My suggestion is about this unfortunate ticket status
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 01:32 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
>>
>>> My suggestion is about this unfortunate ticket status -- 'Accepted'.
>>> This now works as a sort of a dusty shelf: wh
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 01:32 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
>
>> My suggestion is about this unfortunate ticket status -- 'Accepted'.
>> This now works as a sort of a dusty shelf: when anyone of the core team
>> looks at the patch and decides that t
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 01:32 +0400, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> My suggestion is about this unfortunate ticket status -- 'Accepted'.
> This now works as a sort of a dusty shelf: when anyone of the core team
> looks at the patch and decides that there's nothing wrong with it he
> puts it on that shelf
On 09/30/2010 01:40 AM, Chuck Harmston wrote:
In my world, the "accepted" status should only be used in one
circumstance: when a person is actively developing under or maintaining
a patch for the ticket. It's an indicator that someone has taken
ownership of a ticket, to prevent duplication of eff
In my world, the "accepted" status should only be used in one circumstance:
when a person is actively developing under or maintaining a patch for the
ticket. It's an indicator that someone has taken ownership of a ticket, to
prevent duplication of effort, etc. For example, I accepted ticket #25
dur
Hello Jacob and everyone.
On 09/29/2010 09:59 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
Starting today, we're going to be making some minor but significant changes
to the way the Django core committer team "does business."
That's about time :-). Congratulations and thank you!
I have a comment and a sugges
17 matches
Mail list logo
