Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-07 Thread Gregor Müllegger
I finally submitted my proposal to the google melange homepage. The core of the proposal is very much unchanged to the first draft, however I've included passages that indicate that the syntax might change in further discussions about this topic and that the concept of a chrome will be propably dro

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-07 Thread Gregor Müllegger
Sorry for the quite late response, everything is getting pretty close to the deadline. I'm not happy with it but I need to tackle some personal issues at once. 2011/4/5 Russell Keith-Magee : > > ... > > In particular, I have two objections: >  * it feels like it's trying to cram too much into a si

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-05 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Gregor Müllegger wrote: > Hi, > > 2011/4/2 Russell Keith-Magee : >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Gregor Müllegger >> wrote: >> Firstly, while it looks fine for a small example, I can see how it >> would rapidly deteriorate if you have lots of fields, or lots

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-04 Thread Gregor Müllegger
2011/4/4 Daniel Greenfeld : > Anyway, as the current lead on Django Uni-Form I think its great that Gregor > is picking up the torch for refactoring form rendering in Django 1.40. He's > obviously done his homework and put a lot of thought into this critical part > of Django. > I'm not a core devel

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-03 Thread Daniel Greenfeld
First off, for some arcane reason Google is forcing formatting on me. Hopefully that doesn't make this email that ugly. Anyway, as the current lead on Django Uni-Form I think its great that Gregor is picking up the torch for refactoring form rendering in Django 1.40. He's obviously done his ho

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-03 Thread Chris Beaven
Haven't got time for a full review of this proposal right now, but I've done a lot of thinking about this area already and am more than happy for anyone to steal my ideas and compare thoughts. Shoot me an email off-list or catch me on #django (as SmileyChris) if you want to discuss more persona

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-03 Thread Gregor Müllegger
Hi, 2011/4/2 Russell Keith-Magee : > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Gregor Müllegger > wrote: >> I suggest reading this proposal online: https://gist.github.com/898375 >> It's exactly the same as below but formated nicely. >> >> >> GSoC 2011 Proposal - Revised form rendering >> ===

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-03 Thread Gregor Müllegger
Hi Yuri, thanks for your toughts. 2011/4/2 burc...@gmail.com : > Gregor, > > Regarding proposal itself, > > the idea to make django form rendering based on templates is good, but > I think it should be simple, modular and not much verbose. > I'd like more to see more modular, but easier syntax: >

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-02 Thread burc...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Secondly, it may be possible to play a trick on the template compiler. > Jonas Obrist suggested this trick to me at Djangocon (US) last year; > however, I haven't had a chance to dig into it any more. > > The trick goes something like t

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-02 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Gregor Müllegger wrote: > I suggest reading this proposal online: https://gist.github.com/898375 > It's exactly the same as below but formated nicely. > > > GSoC 2011 Proposal - Revised form rendering > > > Hi my name is

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-02 Thread Gregor Müllegger
Hi, thanks for your fast feedback. I was really looking forward to your input, I haven't reached you in IRC before. 2011/4/1 Carl Meyer : > Hi Gregor, > > As you've probably seen in past threads, this is an area where I'm quite > motivated to see some improvement. I think you've got quite a strong

Re: [GSoC] Revised form rendering

2011-04-01 Thread Carl Meyer
Hi Gregor, As you've probably seen in past threads, this is an area where I'm quite motivated to see some improvement. I think you've got quite a strong proposal here in general, and you've clearly done your homework, so my comments below dive directly into the details: On 04/01/2011 11:57 AM, Gr