If matters, +1.
People can easily change from $('input[type=text]') to
$('input[type=text],input[type=email]'), it's a easy, no pain change, with
various benefits of HTML5 fields.
I would only suggest that people can do something like
number_field=IntegerField(html5=False) in form (at least in 1.
Hey all - Last I heard, today was the last day for new features for 1.5. I
was triaging tickets yesterday and ran this ticket. [1] The ticket looks
fine, and it addresses the issues raised here. The only new issue (raised
on the ticket) is that this change could break third-party javascript and
+1 for Paul's concerns. I think this at least should be opt-in.
It can be also more or less implemented without custom widgets but
using Gregor Müllegger's form-rendering branch (which is not merged but
available as https://github.com/SmileyChris/django-forms app if I
understand it properly) -
On 12/28/2011 05:15 AM, poswald wrote:
I have a concern regarding this.. A few times I have tried to
integrate django-floppyforms which takes a similar approach to what
the html5 widgets offer (input types are specified by default) and it
often causes pain. The reason is that while browsers say t
I have a concern regarding this.. A few times I have tried to
integrate django-floppyforms which takes a similar approach to what
the html5 widgets offer (input types are specified by default) and it
often causes pain. The reason is that while browsers say they support
html5 input types sometimes t
On 27 déc. 2011, at 17:15, Jonas H. wrote:
> This patch has been around for while now. I just updated the patch so it
> applies cleanly against rev 17281.
>
> So, can we get this patch into trunk or is something missing?
Hi Jonas,
The patch looks pretty good, but it needs documentation:
- in t