On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Tim Diggins wrote:
> wondering why ImageField doesn't rely on width_field and height_field
> (if present and populated) for the dimensions? (i.e. from ImageField's
> perspective these seem to be "write-only" fields).
>
> This seems pretty unperformant (moving to ri
Hi there -
wondering why ImageField doesn't rely on width_field and height_field
(if present and populated) for the dimensions? (i.e. from ImageField's
perspective these seem to be "write-only" fields).
This seems pretty unperformant (moving to ridiculously unperformant if
you're using a remote s
