Re: QueryDict.iteritems behaves differently than QueryDict.items

2008-07-04 Thread Tai Lee
1.0 should ideally ship with Zarro Boogs, so any bugs (not DDN) especially trivial ones with a patch including relavent tests / docs should be marked for 1.0 milestone, I think ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: QueryDict.iteritems behaves differently than QueryDict.items

2008-07-04 Thread Jure Vrscaj
> Also, what compatibility does it break? I can't see how this is a common > use-case. It might break existing code, code that depends on iteritems() yielding lists. Maybe not a common use case, but it got me scratching my head more than once. On Jul 4, 7:40 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROT

Re: QueryDict.iteritems behaves differently than QueryDict.items

2008-07-03 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:54 +0200, Ludvig Ericson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Jul 4, 2008, at 00:45, Jure Vrscaj wrote: > > > Could this be fixed in 1.0? It breaks compatibility, I know. > > > Although I'm not in any kind of position of making such a decisi

Re: QueryDict.iteritems behaves differently than QueryDict.items

2008-07-03 Thread Ludvig Ericson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 4, 2008, at 00:45, Jure Vrscaj wrote: > Could this be fixed in 1.0? It breaks compatibility, I know. Although I'm not in any kind of position of making such a decision, I can make an educated guess: no. The reason is that most developers

QueryDict.iteritems behaves differently than QueryDict.items

2008-07-03 Thread Jure Vrscaj
I found the ticket for this strange behaviour of QueryDict, which meant I wasn't alone having a problem with it - http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7331, and submited a patch. It's actually MultiValueDict that is the cause, but let's clarify things a little, first. Consider this scenario: >